197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28165603)
1. Comparative survival analysis of porous tantalum and porous titanium acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty.
Vutescu ES; Hsiue P; Paprosky W; Nandi S
Hip Int; 2017 Sep; 27(5):505-508. PubMed ID: 28165603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term results of combined porous tantalum augments and titanium-coated cups for Paprosky type III bone defects in acetabular revision.
Xiao Q; Xu B; Zhou K; Ling T; Yuan M; Pei F; Zhou Z
Int Orthop; 2021 Jul; 45(7):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 34019127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Use of Porous Tantalum Augments for the Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Ling TX; Li JL; Zhou K; Xiao Q; Pei FX; Zhou ZK
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):453-459. PubMed ID: 29033154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Stability of the Porous Tantalum Components Used in Revision THA to Treat Severe Acetabular Defects: A Radiostereometric Analysis Study.
Solomon LB; Abrahams JM; Callary SA; Howie DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(22):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 30480597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum ten-year clinical, radiological and quality of life outcome study.
Konan S; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jun; 98-B(6):767-71. PubMed ID: 27235518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Highly Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components Without Ancillary Screws Have Similar Migration to Porous Titanium Acetabular Components With Screws at 2 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Howie DW; Holubowycz OT; Callary SA; Robertson TS; Solomon LB
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2931-2937. PubMed ID: 32593487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary Porous Titanium Acetabular Components for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Pelvic Radiation.
Wellings EP; Couch CG; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
J Arthroplasty; 2021 May; 36(5):1714-1718. PubMed ID: 33483248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?
Brüggemann A; Fredlund E; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27892748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Highly Porous Titanium Acetabular Components in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Malahias MA; Kostretzis L; Greenberg A; Nikolaou VS; Atrey A; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1737-1749. PubMed ID: 32070658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survivorship of a Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty With a Mean Follow-Up of 18 Years.
Macheras GA; Lepetsos P; Leonidou AO; Anastasopoulos PP; Galanakos SP; Poultsides LA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3680-3684. PubMed ID: 28734611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision for Aseptic Loosening of Highly Porous Acetabular Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 20,993 Total Hip Replacements.
Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Holder C; Graves SE; Bingham R
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):312-315. PubMed ID: 34699913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midterm Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Use of a Multihole Highly-Porous Titanium Shell.
Delanois RE; Gwam CU; Mohamed N; Khlopas A; Chughtai M; Malkani AL; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2806-2809. PubMed ID: 28456559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excellent mid-term outcomes with a hemispheric titanium porous-coated acetabular component for total hip arthroplasty: 7-10 year follow-up.
Yeroushalmi D; Singh V; Maher N; Gabor JA; Zuckerman JD; Schwarzkopf R
Hip Int; 2023 May; 33(3):404-410. PubMed ID: 34412531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 100(13):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 29975265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips.
Unger AS; Lewis RJ; Gruen T
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1002-9. PubMed ID: 16376255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defect With Structural Allograft and Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup.
Chang CH; Hu CC; Chen CC; Mahajan J; Chang Y; Shih HN; Kwon YM
Orthopedics; 2018 Nov; 41(6):e861-e867. PubMed ID: 30371922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
