257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28165653)
21. Additional value of magnetic resonance-targeted biopsies to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
von Below C; Wassberg C; Norberg M; Tolf A; Kullberg J; Ladjevardi S; Häggman M; Bill Axelson A; Ahlström H
Scand J Urol; 2017 Apr; 51(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 28635568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy.
Bryk DJ; Llukani E; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang WC; Lepor H
Urology; 2017 Apr; 102():178-182. PubMed ID: 27871829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prebiopsy MRI and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy in Men With Previous Negative Biopsies: Impact on Repeat Biopsy Strategies.
Mendhiratta N; Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Wysock JS; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Deng FM; Melamed J; Zhou M; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
Urology; 2015 Dec; 86(6):1192-8. PubMed ID: 26335497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prebiopsy multiparametric 3T prostate MRI in patients with elevated PSA, normal digital rectal examination, and no previous biopsy.
Jambor I; Kähkönen E; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Saunavaara J; Alanen K; Obsitnik B; Minn H; Lehotska V; Aronen HJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 41(5):1394-404. PubMed ID: 24956412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective nonrandomized study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent MRI-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.
Castellucci R; Linares Quevedo AI; Sánchez Gómez FJ; Díez Rodríguez J; Cogorno L; Cogollos Acuña I; Salmerón Béliz I; Muñoz Fernández de Legaría M; Martínez Piñeiro L
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):589-595. PubMed ID: 29094851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictive Parameters Identifying Men Eligible for a Sole MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Targeted Biopsy without an Additional Systematic Biopsy.
Günzel K; Haas M; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Buckendahl J; Asbach P; Miller K; Kempkensteffen C; Cash H
Urol Int; 2017; 98(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 27618633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI.
Liang L; Qi F; Cheng Y; Zhang L; Cao D; Cheng G; Hua L
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6048. PubMed ID: 33723287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Nomogram to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Targeted Biopsy for Index Lesion.
Kim MJ; Park SY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Apr; 55(4):1226-1233. PubMed ID: 34296803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study.
Puech P; Rouvière O; Renard-Penna R; Villers A; Devos P; Colombel M; Bitker MO; Leroy X; Mège-Lechevallier F; Comperat E; Ouzzane A; Lemaitre L
Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):461-9. PubMed ID: 23579051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Combined Analysis of Biparametric MRI and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: Role in the Prebiopsy Diagnosis of Gleason Score 7 or Greater Prostate Cancer.
Lee SJ; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W166-W172. PubMed ID: 30016148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Among Men Undergoing Combined MRI-targeted and Systematic Biopsy Using Novel Pre-biopsy Nomograms That Incorporate MRI Findings.
Bjurlin MA; Rosenkrantz AB; Sarkar S; Lepor H; Huang WC; Huang R; Venkataraman R; Taneja SS
Urology; 2018 Feb; 112():112-120. PubMed ID: 29155186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China.
Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Stratification of aggressive prostate cancer from indolent disease-Prospective controlled trial utilizing expression of 11 genes in apparently benign tissue.
Alinezhad S; Väänänen RM; Tallgrén T; Perez IM; Jambor I; Aronen H; Kähkönen E; Ettala O; Syvänen K; Nees M; Kallajoki M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pettersson K
Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e15-22. PubMed ID: 26857646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Toward an MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of transperineal prostate biopsy outcome: A physician and patient decision tool.
Lee SM; Liyanage SH; Wulaningsih W; Wolfe K; Carr T; Younis C; Van Hemelrijck M; Popert R; Acher P
Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):664.e11-664.e18. PubMed ID: 28801025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
