339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28166057)
1. Proton therapy of prostate cancer by anterior-oblique beams: implications of setup and anatomy variations.
Moteabbed M; Trofimov A; Sharp GC; Wang Y; Zietman AL; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1644-1660. PubMed ID: 28166057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers mitigate the uncertainties in proton relative biological effectiveness associated with anterior-oblique beams.
Underwood TS; Voog JC; Moteabbed M; Tang S; Soffen E; Cahlon O; Lu HM; Zietman AL; Efstathiou JA; Paganetti H
Acta Oncol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):575-581. PubMed ID: 28075206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Prospective Comparison of the Effects of Interfractional Variations on Proton Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.
Moteabbed M; Trofimov A; Sharp GC; Wang Y; Zietman AL; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):444-453. PubMed ID: 26907917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Degradation of target coverage due to inter-fraction motion during intensity-modulated proton therapy of prostate and elective targets.
Thörnqvist S; Muren LP; Bentzen L; Hysing LB; Høyer M; Grau C; Petersen JB
Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 23409771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical variations on prostate proton therapy using daily in-room CT images.
Wang Y; Efstathiou JA; Sharp GC; Lu HM; Ciernik IF; Trofimov AV
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4623-33. PubMed ID: 21928635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.
Kraan AC; van de Water S; Teguh DN; Al-Mamgani A; Madden T; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):888-96. PubMed ID: 24351409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Underwood T; Giantsoudi D; Moteabbed M; Zietman A; Efstathiou J; Paganetti H; Lu HM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 27084660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Passive proton therapy vs. IMRT planning study with focal boost for prostate cancer.
Yeo I; Nookala P; Gordon I; Schulte R; Barnes S; Ghebremedhin A; Wang N; Yang G; Ling T; Bush D; Slater J; Patyal B
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 10():213. PubMed ID: 26499318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective study comparing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) setup strategies for prostate treatment: repositioning vs. replanning.
Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; An HJ; Kim YJ; Kim JH
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):139. PubMed ID: 31387593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probabilistic dose distribution from interfractional motion in carbon ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer shows rectum sparing with moderate target coverage degradation.
Bridges D; Kawamura H; Kanai T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203289. PubMed ID: 30169520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric and radiobiological consequences of computed tomography-guided adaptive strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of the prostate.
Battista JJ; Johnson C; Turnbull D; Kempe J; Bzdusek K; Van Dyk J; Bauman G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 23978708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of intrafraction and residual interfraction effect on prostate proton pencil beam scanning.
Tang S; Deville C; Tochner Z; Wang KK; McDonough J; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1186-94. PubMed ID: 25442043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment and management of interfractional variations in daily diagnostic-quality-CT guided prostate-bed irradiation after prostatectomy.
Liu F; Ahunbay E; Lawton C; Li XA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031710. PubMed ID: 24593714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PTV margin analysis for prostate patients treated with initial pelvic nodal IMRT and prostate proton boost.
Su Z; Li Z; Henderson R; Hoppe B; Nichols RC; Bryant C; Mendenhall W; Mendenhall N
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(4):04NT04. PubMed ID: 30630135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing photon and proton-based hypofractioned SBRT for prostate cancer accounting for robustness and realistic treatment deliverability.
Goddard LC; Brodin NP; Bodner WR; Garg MK; Tomé WA
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20180010. PubMed ID: 29436852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positioning accuracy and daily dose assessment for prostate cancer treatment using in-room CT image guidance at a proton therapy facility.
Maeda Y; Sato Y; Minami H; Yasukawa Y; Yamamoto K; Tamamura H; Shibata S; Bou S; Sasaki M; Tameshige Y; Kume K; Ooto H; Kasahara S; Shimizu Y; Saga Y; Omoya A; Saitou M
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1832-1843. PubMed ID: 29532489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective MRI-based imaging study to assess feasibility of proton therapy for post-prostatectomy radiation.
Swisher-McClure S; Yin L; Rosen M; Batra S; Berman AT; Both S; Vapiwala N
Acta Oncol; 2016 Jul; 55(7):828-33. PubMed ID: 27145164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of organ motion on proton prostate treatments, as determined from analysis of daily CT imaging for patient positioning.
Maeda Y; Sato Y; Shibata S; Bou S; Yamamoto K; Tamamura H; Fuwa N; Takamatsu S; Sasaki M; Tameshige Y; Kume K; Minami H; Saga Y; Saito M
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1844-1856. PubMed ID: 29574901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
