BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28166468)

  • 21. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Heterogeneity in the definition of dose-limiting toxicity in phase I cancer clinical trials of molecularly targeted agents: a review of the literature.
    Le Tourneau C; Razak AR; Gan HK; Pop S; DiƩras V; Tresca P; Paoletti X
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jul; 47(10):1468-75. PubMed ID: 21482105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determinants of the recommended phase 2 dose of molecular targeted agents.
    Hansen AR; Cook N; Amir E; Siu LL; Abdul Razak AR
    Cancer; 2017 Apr; 123(8):1409-1415. PubMed ID: 28182250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Two-stage dose finding for cytostatic agents in phase I oncology trials.
    Yin G; Zheng S; Xu J
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):644-60. PubMed ID: 22855354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Toxicity-evaluation designs for phase I/II cancer immunotherapy trials.
    Messer K; Natarajan L; Ball ED; Lane TA
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):712-20. PubMed ID: 20213706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dose-finding designs using a novel quasi-continuous endpoint for multiple toxicities.
    Ezzalfani M; Zohar S; Qin R; Mandrekar SJ; Deley MC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2728-46. PubMed ID: 23335156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Novel dose-finding designs and considerations on practical implementations in oncology clinical trials.
    Huang B; Bycott P; Talukder E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 26882496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adaptive dose-finding based on safety and feasibility in early-phase clinical trials of adoptive cell immunotherapy.
    Wages NA; Fadul CE
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 31856602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.
    Zang Y; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Jun; 11(3):319-327. PubMed ID: 24844841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative study of adaptive trial designs for dose optimization.
    Zhang J; Chen X; Li B; Yan F
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(5):797-814. PubMed ID: 37156731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Challenges and Innovations in Phase I Dose-Finding Designs for Molecularly Targeted Agents and Cancer Immunotherapies.
    Yin J; Shen S
    J Biom Biostat; 2016 Dec; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 28616356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.
    Lee SM; Wages NA; Goodman KA; Lockhart AC
    JCO Precis Oncol; 2021 Jan; 5():317-324. PubMed ID: 34151131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.
    Zang Y; Guo B; Qiu Y; Liu H; Opyrchal M; Lu X
    Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 38205644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Design considerations for phase I/II dose finding clinical trials in Immuno-oncology and cell therapy.
    Liu R; Lin J; Li P
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Sep; 96():106083. PubMed ID: 32659438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint.
    Hunsberger S; Rubinstein LV; Dancey J; Korn EL
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2171-81. PubMed ID: 15909289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
    Wang Y; Ivanova A
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials.
    Riviere MK; Dubois F; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24464821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.
    Gerke O; Siedentop H
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5329-44. PubMed ID: 17849502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do all patients in the phase I oncology trials need to be hospitalized? Domestic but outstanding issues for globalization of drug development in Japan.
    Shimomura A; Kondo S; Kobayashi N; Iwasa S; Kitano S; Tamura K; Fujiwara Y; Yamamoto N
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 22(4):780-785. PubMed ID: 28293794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal biological dose: a systematic review in cancer phase I clinical trials.
    Fraisse J; Dinart D; Tosi D; Bellera C; Mollevi C
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33441097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.