These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28166709)

  • 1. Biomarker validation with an imperfect reference: Issues and bounds.
    Emerson SC; Waikar SS; Fuentes C; Bonventre JV; Betensky RA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Oct; 27(10):2933-2945. PubMed ID: 28166709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of diagnostic accuracy of a combination of continuous biomarkers allowing for conditional dependence between the biomarkers and the imperfect reference-test.
    García Barrado L; Coart E; Burzykowski T
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):646-655. PubMed ID: 27598904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods.
    Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson KJ; Allen AJ; Vale L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33845775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imperfect gold standards for kidney injury biomarker evaluation.
    Waikar SS; Betensky RA; Emerson SC; Bonventre JV
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 22021710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imperfect gold standards for biomarker evaluation.
    Waikar SS; Betensky RA; Emerson SC; Bonventre JV
    Clin Trials; 2013 Oct; 10(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 24006246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
    Pepe MS; Janes H
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
    Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
    Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
    Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown.
    Enøe C; Georgiadis MP; Johnson WO
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):61-81. PubMed ID: 10802334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
    Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
    Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostic test accuracy using Bayesian latent class analysis in the presence of conditional dependence between the diagnostic tests used in a community-based tuberculosis screening study.
    Keter AK; Lynen L; Van Heerden A; Wong E; Reither K; Goetghebeur E; Jacobs BKM
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282417. PubMed ID: 36862729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latent Class Analysis: Insights about design and analysis of schistosomiasis diagnostic studies.
    Koukounari A; Jamil H; Erosheva E; Shiff C; Moustaki I
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Feb; 15(2):e0009042. PubMed ID: 33539357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
    Collins J; Huynh M
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
    Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.