These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28166735)

  • 1. What impact do assumptions about missing data have on conclusions? A practical sensitivity analysis for a cancer survival registry.
    Smuk M; Carpenter JR; Morris TP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 28166735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a weighting approach for performing sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation.
    Rezvan PH; White IR; Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():83. PubMed ID: 26464305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Missing not at random in end of life care studies: multiple imputation and sensitivity analysis on data from the ACTION study.
    Carreras G; Miccinesi G; Wilcock A; Preston N; Nieboer D; Deliens L; Groenvold M; Lunder U; van der Heide A; Baccini M;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):13. PubMed ID: 33422019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors.
    Galimard JE; Chevret S; Curis E; Resche-Rigon M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):90. PubMed ID: 30170561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling relative survival in the presence of incomplete data: a tutorial.
    Nur U; Shack LG; Rachet B; Carpenter JR; Coleman MP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19858106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An application of a pattern-mixture model with multiple imputation for the analysis of longitudinal trials with protocol deviations.
    Iddrisu AK; Gumedze F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 30626328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: a weighting approach.
    Carpenter JR; Kenward MG; White IR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Jun; 16(3):259-75. PubMed ID: 17621471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical considerations for sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation applied to epidemiological studies with incomplete data.
    Héraud-Bousquet V; Larsen C; Carpenter J; Desenclos JC; Le Strat Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():73. PubMed ID: 22681630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of exclusion, imputation and modelling of missing binary outcome data in frequentist network meta-analysis.
    Spineli LM; Kalyvas C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 32111167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of self-report and biochemically verified tobacco abstinence outcomes with missing data: a sensitivity analysis using two-stage imputation.
    Zhang Y; Luo X; Le CT; Ahluwalia JS; Thomas JL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):170. PubMed ID: 30563473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imputation of missing values of tumour stage in population-based cancer registration.
    Eisemann N; Waldmann A; Katalinic A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Sep; 11():129. PubMed ID: 21929796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multiple imputation approach for MNAR mechanisms compatible with Heckman's model.
    Galimard JE; Chevret S; Protopopescu C; Resche-Rigon M
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(17):2907-20. PubMed ID: 26893215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hybrid return to baseline imputation method to incorporate MAR and MNAR dropout missingness.
    Jin M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Sep; 120():106859. PubMed ID: 35872135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study.
    Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imputing estrogen receptor (ER) status in a population-based cancer registry: a sensitivity analysis.
    Andridge R; Noone AM; Howlader N
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 27921315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handling missing data in modelling quality of clinician-prescribed routine care: Sensitivity analysis of departure from missing at random assumption.
    Gachau S; Quartagno M; Njagi EN; Owuor N; English M; Ayieko P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):3076-3092. PubMed ID: 32390503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assumptions and analysis planning in studies with missing data in multiple variables: moving beyond the MCAR/MAR/MNAR classification.
    Lee KJ; Carlin JB; Simpson JA; Moreno-Betancur M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1268-1275. PubMed ID: 36779333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian framework for health economic evaluation in studies with missing data.
    Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Carpenter JR
    Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 27(11):1670-1683. PubMed ID: 29969834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can one assess whether missing data are missing at random in medical studies?
    Potthoff RF; Tudor GE; Pieper KS; Hasselblad V
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-34. PubMed ID: 16768297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.
    Hayati Rezvan P; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():30. PubMed ID: 25880850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.