These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28166879)

  • 1. Innovation & evaluation of tangible direct manipulation digital drawing pens for children.
    Lee TH; Wu FG; Chen HT
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():207-219. PubMed ID: 28166879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance study on touch-pens size in three screen tasks.
    Wu FG; Luo S
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 16153590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and evaluation approach for increasing stability and performance of touch pens in screen handwriting tasks.
    Wu FG; Luo S
    Appl Ergon; 2006 May; 37(3):319-327. PubMed ID: 16143292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional parameters, wrist posture deviations and comfort: A comparison between a computer mouse and a touch pen as input devices.
    Hemati K; Mirjalili S; Ghasemi MS; Abdolahian Y; Siroos R; Sanati P; Aghilinejad M; Dehghan N
    Work; 2020; 65(4):701-706. PubMed ID: 32333572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of pen design on drawing and writing performance.
    Goonetilleke RS; Hoffmann ER; Luximon A
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 18501332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Icon and user interface design for emergency medical information systems: a case study.
    Salman YB; Cheng HI; Patterson PE
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Jan; 81(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 21920810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drawing tool incorporating tangible user interface concepts enhancing children's understanding and development of color cognition.
    Cheng PJ; Lee IC
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e17482. PubMed ID: 37416692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional factors and physical properties of ballpoint pens that affect user satisfaction: Implications for pen and stylus design.
    Kim K; Proctor RW; Salvendy G
    Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103067. PubMed ID: 32174355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual, tangible, and touch-screen: Comparison of platforms for displaying simple graphics.
    Gershon P; Klatzky RL; Palani H; Giudice NA
    Assist Technol; 2016; 28(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26953681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children using cellular phones: the effects of shortcomings in user interface design.
    Bay S; Ziefle M
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 15960094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and validation of an improved graphical user interface with the 'Tool ball'.
    Lee KW; Lee YC
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 21555114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age and gestural differences in the ease of rotating a virtual 3D image on a large, multi-touch screen.
    Ku CJ; Chen LC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Apr; 116(2):382-405. PubMed ID: 24032318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Text-based and Graphic User Interfaces for novice and expert users.
    Chen JW; Zhang J
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; 2007():125-9. PubMed ID: 18693811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of the performance of trackpoint and touchpads with varied right and left buttons function locations.
    Wu CF; Lai CC; Liu YK
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Mar; 44(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 23036721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rasch family models in e-learning: analyzing architectural sketching with a digital pen.
    Scalise K; Cheng NY; Oskui N
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 19671990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applications of an interaction, process, integration and intelligence (IPII) design approach for ergonomics solutions.
    Xu W; Furie D; Mahabhaleshwar M; Suresh B; Chouhan H
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jul; 62(7):954-980. PubMed ID: 30836051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interface Psychology: Touchscreens Change Attribute Importance, Decision Criteria, and Behavior in Online Choice.
    Brasel SA; Gips J
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2015 Sep; 18(9):534-8. PubMed ID: 26348814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel approach to bi-objective optimization of touch-screen installation position for minimizing physical workload and increasing screen visibility.
    Chihara T; Seo A; Sakamoto J
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102881. PubMed ID: 31422253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computer aided drawing system evaluation with early and late blind users.
    Fernando S; Ohene-Djan J
    Assist Technol; 2022 Jul; 34(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 33544663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review: Development and Technical Design of Tangible User Interfaces in Wide-Field Areas of Application.
    Krestanova A; Cerny M; Augustynek M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(13):. PubMed ID: 34206398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.