These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 281671)

  • 1. [Compressive strength and deformation of dental cements].
    Oilo G; Espevik S
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1978 Dec; 88(11):500-3. PubMed ID: 281671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress/strain behavior of some dental luting cements.
    Oilo G; Espevik S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1978; 36(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 273365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Tensile strength, by the use of the classical method and the diametral one, and compressive strength of composite resins, polycarboxylate and zinc oxide-eugenol cements].
    Muench A; Amado ET
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1975; 13(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 1074224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesive bonding of dental luting cements; influence of surface treatment.
    Oilo G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1978; 36(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 362798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The extent of slits at the interfaces between luting cements and enamel, dentin and alloy.
    Oilo G
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1978; 36(5):257-61. PubMed ID: 281100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The flow properties of dental cements.
    Wilson AD; Lewis BG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jul; 14(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 7400193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cements and eugenol on properties of a visible light-cured composite.
    Powell TL; Huget EF
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 8327359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical properties of luting cements after water storage.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):535-42. PubMed ID: 14531599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demineralization resistance and tensile bond strength of four luting agents after acid attack.
    Stannard JG; Sornkul E
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 2640123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Characteristics of dental cements and their use].
    Ishikawa T
    Shiyo; 1983 Sep; 31(9):11-7. PubMed ID: 6593547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH; Driscoll CF; Hondrum SO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Loher H; Kolbeck C; Trempler C; Stemplinger B; Kopzon V; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 18372038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Testing the adhesive strength of dental cements].
    Noguchi H; Ecchu Y; Nakamura K; Ozonoe Y; Kikuchi T
    DE J Dent Eng; 1984; (69):18-29. PubMed ID: 6434243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.