These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28167896)

  • 1. Interpretability of Multivariate Brain Maps in Linear Brain Decoding: Definition, and Heuristic Quantification in Multivariate Analysis of MEG Time-Locked Effects.
    Kia SM; Vega Pons S; Weisz N; Passerini A
    Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():619. PubMed ID: 28167896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Group-level spatio-temporal pattern recovery in MEG decoding using multi-task joint feature learning.
    Kia SM; Pedregosa F; Blumenthal A; Passerini A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Jun; 285():97-108. PubMed ID: 28495369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decoding Dynamic Brain Patterns from Evoked Responses: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis Applied to Time Series Neuroimaging Data.
    Grootswagers T; Wardle SG; Carlson TA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 29(4):677-697. PubMed ID: 27779910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fast bootstrapping and permutation testing for assessing reproducibility and interpretability of multivariate fMRI decoding models.
    Conroy BR; Walz JM; Sajda P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79271. PubMed ID: 24244465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multivariate pattern analysis for MEG: A comparison of dissimilarity measures.
    Guggenmos M; Sterzer P; Cichy RM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():434-447. PubMed ID: 29499313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging.
    Haufe S; Meinecke F; Görgen K; Dähne S; Haynes JD; Blankertz B; Bießmann F
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():96-110. PubMed ID: 24239590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatiotemporally resolved multivariate pattern analysis for M/EEG.
    Higgins C; Vidaurre D; Kolling N; Liu Y; Behrens T; Woolrich M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jul; 43(10):3062-3085. PubMed ID: 35302683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decoding N400m Evoked Component: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis for OP-MEG Data.
    Wu H; Wang R; Ma Y; Liang X; Liu C; Yu D; An N; Ning X
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 38927845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Decoding of Multi-Modal Imagery Behavior Focusing on Temporal Complexity.
    Furutani N; Nariya Y; Takahashi T; Ito H; Yoshimura Y; Hiraishi H; Hasegawa C; Ikeda T; Kikuchi M
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():746. PubMed ID: 32848924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiclass fMRI data decoding and visualization using supervised self-organizing maps.
    Hausfeld L; Valente G; Formisano E
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():54-66. PubMed ID: 24531045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive neural network classifier for decoding MEG signals.
    Zubarev I; Zetter R; Halme HL; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():425-434. PubMed ID: 31059799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining sparseness and smoothness improves classification accuracy and interpretability.
    de Brecht M; Yamagishi N
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(2):1550-61. PubMed ID: 22261376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exceeding chance level by chance: The caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy.
    Combrisson E; Jerbi K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 250():126-36. PubMed ID: 25596422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model-based feature construction for multivariate decoding.
    Brodersen KH; Haiss F; Ong CS; Jung F; Tittgemeyer M; Buhmann JM; Weber B; Stephan KE
    Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(2):601-15. PubMed ID: 20406688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the Optimal Number of MEG Trials: A Machine Learning and Speech Decoding Perspective.
    Dash D; Ferrari P; Malik S; Montillo A; Maldjian JA; Wang J
    Brain Inform (2018); 2019 Dec; 11309():163-172. PubMed ID: 31768504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetometers vs Gradiometers for Neural Speech Decoding.
    Dash D; Ferrari P; Babajani-Feremi A; Borna A; Schwindt PDD; Wang J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():6543-6546. PubMed ID: 34892608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetoencephalography Decoding Transfer Approach: From Deep Learning Models to Intrinsically Interpretable Models.
    Fan Y; Li Q; Mao H; Jiang F
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2024 May; 28(5):2818-2829. PubMed ID: 38349827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of functional MRI for detection, decoding and high-resolution imaging of the response patterns of cortical columns.
    Chaimow D; Uğurbil K; Shmuel A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jan; 164():67-99. PubMed ID: 28461061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-Scale Spatio-Temporal Fusion with Adaptive Brain Topology Learning for fMRI Based Neural Decoding.
    Li Z; Li Q; Zhu Z; Hu Z; Wu X
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2023 Oct; PP():. PubMed ID: 37871094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decoding performance for hand movements: EEG vs. MEG.
    Waldert S; Braun C; Preissl H; Birbaumer N; Aertsen A; Mehring C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5346-8. PubMed ID: 18003215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.