These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2816844)

  • 21. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition.
    de Almeida MR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Weber U; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 16097222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance.
    Remmer KR; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS; Way DC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 3864370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Erverdi N; Ozkan G
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8529750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion.
    Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evidence-based approach to treatment of open bite and deep bite: case reports.
    Hans MG; Teng CM; Liao CC; Chen YH; Yang CY
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 17373225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 8746176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dentofacial maturation of untreated normals.
    Sinclair PM; Little RM
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 3861100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The maxillary sagittal appliance: a clinical study.
    Owen AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Apr; 91(4):271-85. PubMed ID: 3551578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients.
    Pedrin F; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Torres F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 16527639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator and extraoral traction appliances.
    Righellis EG
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Apr; 53(2):107-21. PubMed ID: 6576650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The interplay between sagittal and vertical growth factors. An implant study of activator treatment.
    Williams S; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Apr; 81(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 6960721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term effect of the chincap on hard and soft tissues.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Richardson A
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 21(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 10407538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The mandibular plane angle in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Jan; 49(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 283705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.
    Teuscher U
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):258-75. PubMed ID: 281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A cephalometric study of mandibular changes in modified function regulator (Fränkel) treatment.
    Haynes S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Oct; 90(4):308-20. PubMed ID: 3464192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.