These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28168693)

  • 1. The fate of manuscripts rejected from Anaesthesia.
    Docherty AB; Klein AA
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Apr; 72(4):427-430. PubMed ID: 28168693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lesson from fate of rejected paper.
    Wiwanitkit V
    Indian Pediatr; 2011 May; 48(5):410. PubMed ID: 21654014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal.
    Ray J; Berkwits M; Davidoff F
    Am J Med; 2000 Aug; 109(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 10967154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fate of articles rejected by Indian Pediatrics.
    Dewan P; Gupta P; Shah D
    Indian Pediatr; 2010 Dec; 47(12):1031-5. PubMed ID: 21220799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fate of rejected manuscripts.
    Colaianni LA
    Am J Med; 2000 Aug; 109(2):162-3. PubMed ID: 10967159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fate of triaged and rejected manuscripts.
    Zoccali C; Amodeo D; Argiles A; Arici M; D'arrigo G; Evenepoel P; Fliser D; Fox J; Gesualdo L; Jadoul M; Ketteler M; Malyszko J; Massy Z; Mayer G; Ortiz A; Sever M; Vanholder R; Vinck C; Wanner C; Więcek A
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1947-50. PubMed ID: 26597920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fate of manuscripts rejected by Intensive Care Medicine from 2013 to 2016: a follow-up analysis.
    Citerio G; Deutsch E; Sala E; Lavillonnière M; Perner A; Jaber S; Timsit JF; Azoulay E
    Intensive Care Med; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2300-2301. PubMed ID: 30298204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
    Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
    Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts.
    Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The ultimate fate of articles rejected for publication in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde].
    Koene HR; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Dec; 138(49):2443-6. PubMed ID: 7997300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
    Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal?
    Kljaković-Gaspić M; Hren D; Marusić A; Marusić M
    Arch Med Res; 2003; 34(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 14602513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings.
    Yentis SM; Campbell FA; Lerman J
    Can J Anaesth; 1993 Jul; 40(7):632-4. PubMed ID: 8403137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving peer review: What authors can do.
    Baker WL; DiDomenico RJ; Haines ST
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2017 Dec; 74(24):2076-2079. PubMed ID: 29074481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What to Do When Your Paper Is Rejected.
    Sullivan GM
    J Grad Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 26217410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.