These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28168940)

  • 1. Technoscience, imagined publics and public imaginations.
    Rommetveit K; Wynne B
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Feb; 26(2):133-147. PubMed ID: 28168940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensifying embroilments: Technosciences, imaginaries and publics.
    Pellizzoni L
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Feb; 26(2):212-219. PubMed ID: 28168939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation.
    Sobbrio P; Jorqui M
    Xenotransplantation; 2014; 21(6):523-32. PubMed ID: 25040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.
    Gehrke PJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23887250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mirror for science.
    Jasanoff S
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 24434707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further disorientation in the hall of mirrors.
    Wynne B
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 24434714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New surveillance technologies and their publics: A case of biometrics.
    Martin AK; Donovan KP
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Oct; 24(7):842-57. PubMed ID: 24510921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publics in the making: mediating different methods of engagement and the publics these construct : commentary on: "Technologies of democracy: experiments and demonstrations".
    Mohr A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 21984332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Imagining ourselves' as participating publics: An example from biodiversity conservation.
    Castro P; Mouro C
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Oct; 25(7):858-72. PubMed ID: 25907163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taxonomy, biodiversity and their publics in twenty-first-century DNA barcoding.
    Ellis R; Waterton C; Wynne B
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):497-512. PubMed ID: 20977186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Engaging with the political imaginaries of science: Near misses and future targets.
    Nowotny H
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 24434706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The first bite: Imaginaries, promotional publics and the laboratory grown burger.
    O'Riordan K; Fotopoulou A; Stephens N
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Feb; 26(2):148-163. PubMed ID: 27029766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Food, publics, science.
    Blue G
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 20533794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "It shouldn't look aggressive": How conceptions about publics shape the development of mining exploration technologies.
    Bleicher A; Häßler P; David M
    Public Underst Sci; 2022 Nov; 31(8):978-992. PubMed ID: 35652413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can media monitoring be a proxy for public opinion about technoscientific controversies? The case of the Italian public debate on nuclear power.
    Neresini F; Lorenzet A
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Feb; 25(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 25287766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anticipating health innovations in 2030-2040: Where does responsibility lie for the publics?
    Lehoux P; Miller FA; Grimard D; Gauthier P
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Apr; 27(3):276-293. PubMed ID: 28795612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Art for public engagement on emerging and controversial technologies: A literature review.
    Fraaije A; van der Meij MG; Kupper F; Broerse JEW
    Public Underst Sci; 2022 Aug; 31(6):694-710. PubMed ID: 35570661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.
    Kyle R; Dodds S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2009 Mar; 15(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 18825510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".
    Wynne B
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 22015948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.