These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28169017)

  • 21. Reply to Christian Daniel Fankhauser, Lorelei A. Mucci, and Travis A. Gerke's Letter to the Editor re: Won Sik Ham, Heather J. Chalfin, Zhaoyong Feng, et al. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2017;71:907-12.
    Epstein JI; Trock B; Han M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):e11-e12. PubMed ID: 28108147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Re: Alessandro Sciarra, Valeria Panebianco, Stefano Salciccia, et al. Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008;54:589-600.
    Casciani E; Bertini L; Gualdi G
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):e2-3; author reply e4-5. PubMed ID: 18572302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Re: Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system. B. J. Trock, C. C. Guo, M. L. Gonzalgo, A. Magheli, S. Loeb and J. I. Epstein. J Urol 2009; 182: 1364-1370.
    Ikenberg K; Zimmermann AK; Kristiansen G
    J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):2100; author reply 2100-1. PubMed ID: 20359717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Re: Administrative data sets are inaccurate for assessing functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: M. K. Tollefson, M. T. Gettman, R. J. Karnes and I. Frank J Urol 2011; 185: 1686-1690.
    Cathcart P; Connolly S; Walton T; Costello AJ; Murphy DG
    J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):2133-4; author reply 2134. PubMed ID: 21944984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re: Clinical significance of prospectively assigned gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 prostate cancer.
    Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
    Prostate; 2016 Sep; 76(12):1130-1. PubMed ID: 27225506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Re: Ettore Di Trapani, Alessandro Nini, Irene Locatelli, et al. Development of the First Model of Radical Prostatectomy in the Mouse: A Feasibility Study. Eur Urol 2018;73:482-4.
    Campodonico F; Ennas M; Introini C
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):e133. PubMed ID: 29458986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reply to Weigang Yan, Zhien Zhou, Hanzhong Li's Letter to the Editor re: Jeffrey J. Tosoian, Debasish Sundi, Bruce J. Trock, et al. Pathologic Outcomes in Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Men Electing Active Surveillance and Immediate Surgery. Eur Urol 2016;69:576-81.
    Tosoian JJ; Trock BJ; Ballentine Carter H; Mamawala M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jan; 71(1):e13. PubMed ID: 27311363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of pathologic revision and Ki67 and ERG immunohistochemistry on predicting radical prostatectomy outcome in men initially on active surveillance.
    Bokhorst LP; Roobol MJ; Bangma CH; van Leenders GJ
    Prostate; 2017 Jul; 77(10):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 28543353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risk of Gleason grade inaccuracies in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
    Shapiro RH; Johnstone PA
    Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):661-6. PubMed ID: 22925240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
    Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical significance of prospectively assigned Gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer.
    Doshi C; Vacchio M; Attwood K; Murekeyisoni C; Mehedint DC; Badkhshan S; Azabdaftari G; Sule N; Guru KA; Mohler JL; Kauffman EC
    Prostate; 2016 Jun; 76(8):715-21. PubMed ID: 26880312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Re: Meelan Bul, Xiaoye Zhu, Antti Rannikko, et al. Radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer following initial active surveillance: results from a prospective observational study. Eur Urol 2012;62:195-200.
    Labanaris AP; Zugor V; Witt JH
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):e11. PubMed ID: 23021088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Re: Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer CenterS. Carlsson, N. Benfante, R. Alvim, D. D. Sjoberg, A. Vickers, V. E. Reuter, S. W. Fine, H. A. Vargas, M. Wiseman, M. Mamoor, B. Ehdaie, V. Laudone, P. Scardino, J. Eastham and K. Touijer
    Shah N; Ioffe V
    J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):1063-1064. PubMed ID: 32698711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prognostic Significance of the Disparity Between Biopsy and Pathologic Gleason Score After Radical Prostatectomy in Clinical Candidates for Active Surveillance According to the Royal Marsden Criteria.
    Jo JK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S; Oh JJ
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2016 Aug; 14(4):e329-33. PubMed ID: 26935997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Re: William C. Jackson, Matthew J. Schipper, Skyler B. Johnson, et al. Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Influences Outcomes for Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy Following Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2016;69:50-7. Re: Ronald C. Chen. Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy: Whether and How Long to Give Concurrent Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Eur Urol 2016;69:58-9: Which patients need treatment intensification?
    Dal Pra A; Spahn M
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):e74-e75. PubMed ID: 26508311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Risk factors of ISUP Modified Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy].
    Li XD; Qu GY; Xu N; Xue XY; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Li JF; Cai H; Lin YZ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 May; 22(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 27416665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.