These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28169189)

  • 1. Ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF: is more better than less?
    Alper MM; Fauser BC
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2017 Apr; 34(4):345-353. PubMed ID: 28169189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.
    Hohmann FP; Macklon NS; Fauser BC
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2003 Jan; 88(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 12519847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].
    Ye H; Huang GN; Cao YX; Zhong Y; Huang YH; Zhu GJ; Zhou LM; Chen ZJ; Shi JZ; Zeng Y; Weng N; Huang XF; Yang J; Zhu YM; Li YP; Yi D; Zhuang GL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 48(11):838-42. PubMed ID: 24444561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do poor-responder patients benefit from increasing the daily gonadotropin dose during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF?
    Haas J; Zilberberg E; Machtinger R; Kedem A; Hourvitz A; Orvieto R
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2015 Jan; 31(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 25223892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
    Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The myths surrounding mild stimulation in vitro fertilization (IVF).
    Orvieto R; Vanni VS; Gleicher N
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Jun; 15(1):48. PubMed ID: 28645286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [CHALLENGING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF RETRIEVED OOCYTES AND ITS IMPACT ON PREGNANCY AND LIVE BIRTH RATES IN IVF/ICSI CYCLES].
    Blais I; Lahav-Baratz S; Koifman M; Wiener-Megnazi Z; Auslender R; Dirnfeld M
    Harefuah; 2015 Jun; 154(6):350-5, 406. PubMed ID: 26281076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mild
    Siristatidis C; Salamalekis G; Dafopoulos K; Basios G; Vogiatzi P; Papantoniou N
    In Vivo; 2017; 31(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 28358705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Do poor-responder patients benefit from increasing the daily gonadotropin dose from 300 to 450 IU during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF?].
    Haas J; Zilberberg E; Kedem A; Dar S; Orvieto R
    Harefuah; 2015 Feb; 154(2):114-7, 135. PubMed ID: 25856865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
    Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal stimulation IVF vs conventional IVF: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang JJ; Merhi Z; Yang M; Bodri D; Chavez-Badiola A; Repping S; van Wely M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):96.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26259908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of clinical outcome of mild-stimulation and conventional ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET)].
    Shen J; Wang YX; Liang X; Wang XX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Dec; 45(6):892-5. PubMed ID: 24343069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
    Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hopes and facts about mild ovarian stimulation.
    Ubaldi F; Rienzi L; Baroni E; Ferrero S; Iacobelli M; Minasi MG; Sapienza F; Romano S; Colasante A; Litwicka K; Greco E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Jun; 14(6):675-81. PubMed ID: 17579976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mild stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
    Nargund G; Datta AK; Fauser BCJM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Oct; 108(4):558-567. PubMed ID: 28965549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy versus idiopathic DOR: comparison of in vitro fertilization outcome.
    Roustan A; Perrin J; Debals-Gonthier M; Paulmyer-Lacroix O; Agostini A; Courbiere B
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Apr; 30(4):840-7. PubMed ID: 25740883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of GnRH antagonist fixed protocol and GnRH agonists long protocol in infertile patients with normal ovarian reserve function in their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle].
    Yang S; Chen XN; Qiao J; Liu P; Li R; Chen GA; Ma CH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 22781108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis.
    Verberg MF; Eijkemans MJ; Macklon NS; Heijnen EM; Baart EB; Hohmann FP; Fauser BC; Broekmans FJ
    Hum Reprod Update; 2009; 15(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 19091754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy.
    Merviel P; Cabry-Goubet R; Lourdel E; Devaux A; Belhadri-Mansouri N; Copin H; Benkhalifa M
    Reprod Health; 2015 May; 12():52. PubMed ID: 26025412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.