673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28169256)
1. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress distribution of single-implant-retained overdenture reinforced with a framework: A finite element analysis study.
Amaral CF; Gomes RS; Rodrigues Garcia RCM; Del Bel Cury AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):791-796. PubMed ID: 28965674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of implant number and position on the stress behavior of mandibular implant retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Topkaya T; Solmaz MY
J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2102-9. PubMed ID: 25862522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overdenture retaining bar stress distribution: a finite-element analysis.
Caetano CR; Mesquita MF; Consani RL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Dos Santos MB
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25645607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.
Eraslan R; Yagci F; Esim E
J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):348-357. PubMed ID: 37950537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution with Two Attachment Systems of Varying Heights in a Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Khurana N; Rodrigues S; Shenoy S; Saldanha S; Pai U; Shetty T; N S; Mahesh M; Hegde P
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e795-e805. PubMed ID: 30191668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of stress distribution and flexion among various designs of bar attachments for implant overdentures: a three dimensional finite element analysis.
Prakash V; D'Souza M; Adhikari R
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 19336857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
