These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2816941)

  • 1. Inheritance of chromosome heteromorphisms analyzed by high-resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.
    Trask B; van den Engh G; Gray JW
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Nov; 45(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 2816941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chromosome heteromorphism quantified by high-resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.
    Trask B; van den Engh G; Mayall B; Gray JW
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Nov; 45(5):739-52. PubMed ID: 2479266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of the DNA content of structurally abnormal X chromosomes and X chromosome aneuploidy using high resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.
    Trask B; van den Engh G; Nussbaum R; Schwartz C; Gray J
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 2106419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The potential of family flow karyotyping for the detection of chromosome abnormalities.
    Harris P; Cooke A; Boyd E; Young BD; Ferguson-Smith MA
    Hum Genet; 1987 Jun; 76(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 3610143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standardization of bivariate flow karyotypes of human chromosomes for clinical applications.
    Kuriki H; Takahashi H
    J Clin Lab Anal; 1997; 11(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 9138107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the variation in chromosome size among diverse human populations by bivariate flow karyotyping.
    Mefford H; van den Engh G; Friedman C; Trask BJ
    Hum Genet; 1997 Jul; 100(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 9225983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Swine chromosomal DNA quantification by bivariate flow karyotyping and karyotype interpretation.
    Schmitz A; Chaput B; Fouchet P; Guilly MN; Frelat G; Vaiman M
    Cytometry; 1992; 13(7):703-10. PubMed ID: 1451601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-resolution analysis of human peripheral lymphocyte chromosomes by flow cytometry.
    Young BD; Ferguson-Smith MA; Sillar R; Boyd E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Dec; 78(12):7727-31. PubMed ID: 6950411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bivariate flow karyotyping of human chromosomes: evaluation of variation in Hoechst 33258 fluorescence, chromomycin A3 fluorescence, and relative chromosomal DNA content.
    Boschman GA; Rens W; van Oven CH; Manders EM; Aten JA
    Cytometry; 1991; 12(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 1722448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative karyotyping of human chromosomes by dual beam flow cytometry.
    Langlois RG; Yu LC; Gray JW; Carrano AV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1982 Dec; 79(24):7876-80. PubMed ID: 6961457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of the DNA content of human chromosomes by flow cytometry.
    Harris P; Boyd E; Young BD; Ferguson-Smith MA
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1986; 41(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 3943367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Centromeric index versus DNA content flow karyotypes of human chromosomes measured by means of slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Lucas JN; Gray JW
    Cytometry; 1987 May; 8(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 3595351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromosome Analysis Using Benchtop Flow Analysers and High Speed Cell Sorters.
    Ng BL; Fu B; Graham J; Hall C; Thompson S
    Cytometry A; 2019 Mar; 95(3):323-331. PubMed ID: 30556955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bivariate flow karyotyping, sorting, and peak assignment of all rat chromosomes.
    Shepel LA; Morrissey LW; Hsu LC; Gould MN
    Genomics; 1994 Jan; 19(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 8188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bivariate flow karyotyping in broad bean (Vicia faba).
    Lucretti S; Dolezel J
    Cytometry; 1997 Jul; 28(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 9222109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On-line sorting of human chromosomes by centromeric index, and identification of sorted populations by GTG-banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization.
    Boschman GA; Rens W; Manders E; van Oven C; Barendsen GW; Aten JA
    Hum Genet; 1990 Jun; 85(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 2358302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bivariate chromosome analysis using a commercial flow cytometer.
    Carter NP
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():187-204. PubMed ID: 7518284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flow cytometric quantification of human chromosome specific repetitive DNA sequences by single and bicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization to lymphocyte interphase nuclei.
    van Dekken H; Arkesteijn GJ; Visser JW; Bauman JG
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 2307056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flow karyotyping and sorting of human chromosomes.
    Gray JW; Lucas J; Peters D; Pinkel D; Trask B; van den Engh G; Van Dilla M
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 1986; 51 Pt 1():141-9. PubMed ID: 3472710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flow cytogenetics.
    Bartholdi MF
    Pathobiology; 1990; 58(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 1694434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.