These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28169422)

  • 21. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The guidance of visual search by shape features and shape configurations.
    McCants CW; Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1072-1085. PubMed ID: 29494192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanisms of target localization in visual change detection: an interplay of gating and filtering.
    Schneider D; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():311-9. PubMed ID: 24001756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Toward the influence of temporal attention on the selection of targets in a visual search task: An ERP study.
    Rolke B; Festl F; Seibold VC
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Nov; 53(11):1690-1701. PubMed ID: 27479494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
    Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learning what matters: A neural explanation for the sparsity bias.
    Hassall CD; Connor PC; Trappenberg TP; McDonald JJ; Krigolson OE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 May; 127():62-72. PubMed ID: 29551656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. From alternation to repetition: Spatial attention biases contribute to sequential effects in a choice reaction-time task.
    Green JJ; Spalek TM; McDonald JJ
    Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 11(1-2):24-36. PubMed ID: 31512985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional resources and pop-out detection in search displays.
    Schubö A; Schröger E; Meinecke C; Müller HJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1589-93. PubMed ID: 17885607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2383-2396. PubMed ID: 27357843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disentangling the Role of Cortico-Basal Ganglia Loops in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Visual Attention: An Investigation of Attention Deficits in Parkinson Disease.
    Tommasi G; Fiorio M; Yelnik J; Krack P; Sala F; Schmitt E; Fraix V; Bertolasi L; Le Bas JF; Ricciardi GK; Fiaschi A; Theeuwes J; Pollak P; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1215-37. PubMed ID: 25514652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Top-down knowledge surpasses selection history in influencing attentional guidance.
    Grüner M; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):985-1011. PubMed ID: 36694074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.