159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28169849)
1. Utility of Store and Forward Teledermatology for Skin Patch Test Readings.
Grey KR; Hagen SL; Hylwa SA; Warshaw EM
Dermatitis; 2017; 28(2):152-161. PubMed ID: 28169849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter-rater variability in patch test readings and final interpretation using store-forward teledermatology.
Goodier MC; DeKoven JG; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Zug KA; Hylwa SA; Warshaw EM
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Sep; 85(3):274-284. PubMed ID: 33837533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard 65-allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a series of 794 patients.
Cohen DE; Rao S; Brancaccio RR
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 18627685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of dermatologists in the US: results of a cross-sectional survey.
Warshaw EM; Nelson D
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 12022120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008.
Fransway AF; Zug KA; Belsito DV; Deleo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM; Dekoven J; Zirwas M
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 23340394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive patch test reactions to lanolin: cross-sectional data from the north american contact dermatitis group, 1994 to 2006.
Warshaw EM; Nelsen DD; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Zug KA; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Fowler JF; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA
Dermatitis; 2009; 20(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 19426613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Calibration' of our patch test reading technique is necessary.
Svedman C; Isaksson M; Björk J; Mowitz M; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 22404193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relevance of doubtful ("equivocal") late patch-test readings.
Carlson S; Gipson K; Nedorost S
Dermatitis; 2010; 21(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 20233549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic utility of skin autofluorescence when patch test results are doubtful.
Shin EJ; Seo JK; Lee EJ; Lee ES; Shin MK
Skin Res Technol; 2019 Jan; 25(1):96-99. PubMed ID: 30055047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of photo assessment in late patch test readings-A multicenter study from six European patch test clinics.
Yüksel YT; Sedeh FB; Brans R; Svedman C; Paulsen E; Gimenéz-Arnau A; Foti C; Agner T;
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 May; 84(5):283-289. PubMed ID: 33152126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).
Wentworth AB; Yiannias JA; Keeling JH; Hall MR; Camilleri MJ; Drage LA; Torgerson RR; Fett DD; Prakash AV; Scalf LA; Allen EM; Johnson JS; Singh N; Nordberg Linehan DL; Killian JM; Davis MD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 70(2):269-75.e4. PubMed ID: 24268786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Self-Test Device Used in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
Elsner P; Bjarnøe H; Aberer W; Brasch J
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2015; 28(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 26183752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch test practices and perceptions of Chinese dermatologists: results of a cross-sectional survey.
Zou Y; Wang XM
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 22404195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Targeted testing with diethylthiourea often reveals clinically relevant allergic contact dermatitis caused by neoprene rubber.
Dall AB; Andersen KE; Mortz CG
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Aug; 67(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 22428567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
