154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28170445)
1. Validation of Masimo Pronto 7 and HemoCue 201 for hemoglobin determination in children from 1 to 5 years of age.
Shamah Levy T; Méndez-Gómez-Humarán I; Morales Ruán MD; Martinez Tapia B; Villalpando Hernández S; Hernández Ávila M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170990. PubMed ID: 28170445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-invasive hemoglobin measurement devices require refinement to match diagnostic performance with their high level of usability and acceptability.
Young MF; Raines K; Jameel F; Sidi M; Oliveira-Streiff S; Nwajei P; McGlamry K; Ou J; Oladele A; Suchdev PS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254629. PubMed ID: 34270591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic review and meta-analysis of method comparison studies of Masimo pulse co-oximeters (Radical-7™ or Pronto-7™) and HemoCue® absorption spectrometers (B-Hemoglobin or 201+) with laboratory haemoglobin estimation.
Hiscock R; Kumar D; Simmons SW
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2015 May; 43(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 25943608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Hemoglobin Measurements by 3 Point-of-Care Devices With Standard Laboratory Values and Reliability Regarding Decisions for Blood Transfusion.
Johnson M; Marwick PC; Coetzee JF
Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):640-649. PubMed ID: 31764158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Massimo Pronto-7 and HemoCue Hb 201+ with laboratory haemoglobin estimation: a clinical study.
Hiscock R; Simmons S; Carstensen B; Gurrin L
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2014 Sep; 42(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 25233174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of noninvasive and invasive point-of-care total blood hemoglobin measurement in an outpatient setting.
Raikhel M
Postgrad Med; 2012 Jul; 124(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 22913913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemoglobin point-of-care testing in rural Gambia: Comparing accuracy of HemoCue and Aptus with an automated hematology analyzer.
Nass SA; Hossain I; Sanyang C; Baldeh B; Pereira DIA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239931. PubMed ID: 33002049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods and analyzers for hemoglobin measurement in clinical laboratories and field settings.
Whitehead RD; Mei Z; Mapango C; Jefferds MED
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2019 Aug; 1450(1):147-171. PubMed ID: 31162693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between the HemoCue and an automated counter for measuring hemoglobin.
Paiva Ade A; Rondó PH; Silva SS; Latorre Mdo R
Rev Saude Publica; 2004 Aug; 38(4):585-7. PubMed ID: 15311302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of HemoCue® hemoglobin-meter and automated hematology analyzer in measurement of hemoglobin levels in pregnant women at Khartoum hospital, Sudan.
Adam I; Ahmed S; Mahmoud MH; Yassin MI
Diagn Pathol; 2012 Mar; 7():30. PubMed ID: 22436620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by spectrophotometry (SpHb) and HemoCue® with automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement.
Lamhaut L; Apriotesei R; Combes X; Lejay M; Carli P; Vivien B
Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):548-54. PubMed ID: 21716091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Baseline haemoglobin variability by measurement technique in pregnant people on the day of childbirth.
Caulfield KC; McMahon O; Dennis AT
Anaesthesia; 2024 Feb; 79(2):178-185. PubMed ID: 37990621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of hemoglobin measurement tools and their accuracy and reliability when screening for child anemia in Rwanda: A randomized study.
Parker M; Han Z; Abu-Haydar E; Matsiko E; Iyakaremye D; Tuyisenge L; Magaret A; Lyambabaje A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0187663. PubMed ID: 29300737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Masimo Total Hemoglobin SpHb® continuous non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring device with laboratory complete blood count measurement using venous sample: Protocol for an observational substudy of the Pregnancy Risk and Infant Surveillance and Measurement Alliance Maternal and Newborn Health (PRISMA MNH) study.
Farooq F; Smith ER; Pan Q; Glass Baumann S; Akelo V; Jehan F; Kasaro M; Nisar I; Ouma G; Vwalika B; Spelke MB; Price JT; Hoodbhoy Z
Gates Open Res; 2023; 7():50. PubMed ID: 37868333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement between dried blood spots and HemoCue in Tamil Nadu, India.
Roshania RP; Mehta RV; Shete A; Bingewar R; Kulkarni S; Mahajan A; Miller G; Tarozzi A; Martorell R
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9285. PubMed ID: 33927229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of capillary hemoglobin levels using the HemoCue system in intensive care patients.
Seguin P; Kleiber A; Chanavaz C; Morcet J; Mallédant Y
J Crit Care; 2011 Aug; 26(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 21036530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemoglobin assessment: precision and practicability evaluated in the Netherlands-the HAPPEN study.
Baart AM; de Kort WL; van den Hurk K; Pasker-de Jong PC
Transfusion; 2016 Aug; 56(8):1984-93. PubMed ID: 26968697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of haemoglobin assessments by HemoCue and two automated haematology analysers in young Laotian children.
Hinnouho GM; Barffour MA; Wessells KR; Brown KH; Kounnavong S; Chanhthavong B; Ratsavong K; Kewcharoenwong C; Hess SY
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):532-538. PubMed ID: 29197856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin and invasive point-of-care hemoglobin testing compared with a laboratory analyzer.
Shah N; Osea EA; Martinez GJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2014 Feb; 36(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 23809685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemoglobin measurement in venous blood compared with pooled and single-drop capillary blood: a method-comparison study in a controlled and survey setting in Uganda among children and women.
Namaste SM; Baingana R; Brindle E
Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 Apr; 119(4):949-959. PubMed ID: 38176682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
