These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2817107)

  • 1. The effect of stapedectomy on speech intelligibility in noise.
    Middelweerd MJ; Feenstra L; van der Baan S; Plomp R
    Am J Otol; 1989 Sep; 10(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 2817107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility in stapedectomized individuals.
    Chadwell DL; Greenberg HJ
    Am J Otol; 1979 Oct; 1(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 554471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The quantitative effects of competition on verbal intelligibility in the elderly].
    Prosser S; Orzan E; Miani C
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1993; 13(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8256616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disturbed speech intelligibility in noise despite a normal audiogram: a defect in temporal resolution?
    Rappaport JM; Phillips DP; Gulliver JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1993 Dec; 22(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 8158743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone-conducted speech: intelligibility functions and threshold force levels for spondees.
    Beattie RC; Smiarowski RA
    Am J Otol; 1981 Oct; 3(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 7304720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.
    Häusler R; Stieger C; Bernhard H; Kompis M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 18259077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers.
    Rajan R; Cainer KE
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(2):784-95. PubMed ID: 18485606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision stapedectomy.
    Langman AW; Lindeman RC
    Laryngoscope; 1993 Sep; 103(9):954-8. PubMed ID: 8361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Lyregaard PE
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database.
    Vincent R; Sperling NM; Oates J; Jindal M
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47. PubMed ID: 16985478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The sentence intelligibility in different types of noise regarding people with a normal hearing ability.
    Vokál J; Dlouhá O
    Prague Med Rep; 2009; 110(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 19591379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noradrenergic cerebral stimulation of sensorineural impaired subjects: yohimbine effects on speech intelligibility and the auditory brain response.
    Hughes EC; Gott PS; Weinstein RC; Binggeli R
    Am J Otol; 1988 Mar; 9(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 3407743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.