These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28173710)

  • 1. Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement.
    Forsythe LP; Frank LB; Workman TA; Borsky A; Hilliard T; Harwell D; Fayish L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2017 May; 6(3):245-256. PubMed ID: 28173710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient, caregiver and clinician use of comparative effectiveness research findings in care decisions: results from a national study.
    Frank LB; Forsythe LP; Workman TA; Hilliard T; Lavelle M; Harwell D; Fayish L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2017 May; 6(3):219-229. PubMed ID: 28173724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes toward comparative effectiveness research and patient engagement among reproductive health clinicians.
    Kohn J; Unger Z; Dolatshahi J; Simons H; Rein A
    J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jun; 6(4):337-345. PubMed ID: 28621553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient, caregiver and clinician views on engagement in comparative effectiveness research.
    Forsythe LP; Frank LB; Workman TA; Hilliard T; Harwell D; Fayish L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2017 May; 6(3):231-244. PubMed ID: 28173732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ability and Use of Comparative Effectiveness Research by P&T Committee Members and Support Staff: A 1-Year Follow-up.
    Augustine J; Warholak TL; Hines LE; Sun D; Brown M; Hurwitz J; Taylor AM; Brixner D; Cobaugh DJ; Schlaifer M; Malone DC
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2016 Jun; 22(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 27231790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Patient-Centered Approach to Comparative Effectiveness Research Focused on Older Adults: Lessons From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Mason NR; Sox HC; Whitlock EP
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2019 Jan; 67(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 30586155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research.
    Forsythe LP; Frank L; Walker KO; Anise A; Wegener N; Weisman H; Hunt G; Beal A
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 25565066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.
    Sheridan S; Schrandt S; Forsythe L; Hilliard TS; Paez KA;
    Ann Fam Med; 2017 Mar; 15(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 28289118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health care decision makers' use of comparative effectiveness research: report from a series of focus groups.
    Villa L; Warholak TL; Hines LE; Taylor AM; Brown M; Hurwitz J; Brixner D; Malone DC
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2013; 19(9):745-54. PubMed ID: 24156643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Translating comparative effectiveness research into Medicaid payment policy: views from medical and pharmacy directors.
    Weissman JS; Westrich K; Hargraves JL; Pearson SD; Dubois R; Emond S; Olufajo OA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Mar; 4(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 25825839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Roadmap for Physical Activity and Lifestyle.
    Jakicic JM; Sox H; Blair SN; Bensink M; Johnson WG; King AC; Lee IM; Nahum-Shani I; Sallis JF; Sallis RE; Craft L; Whitehead JR; Ainsworth BE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Aug; 47(8):1747-54. PubMed ID: 25426735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unresolved tensions in consumer engagement in CER: a US research perspective.
    Workman T; Maurer M; Carman K
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Mar; 2(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 24236555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of comparative effectiveness research: a practical tool.
    Schaumberg DA; McDonald L; Shah S; Stokes M; Nordstrom BL; Ramagopalan SV
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 May; 7(5):503-515. PubMed ID: 29463115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing uptake of comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research among stakeholders: insights from conference discussion.
    Law E; Harrington R; Alexander GC; Saha S; Oehrlein E; Perfetto EM
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):181-191. PubMed ID: 29465252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oncology training programs: are we doing comparative effectiveness research justice?
    Zaorsky NG; Showalter TN
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Nov; 2(6):573-82. PubMed ID: 24236796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancing researcher capacity to engage youth in research: Researchers' engagement experiences, barriers and capacity development priorities.
    Hawke LD; Darnay K; Relihan J; Khaleghi-Moghaddam M; Barbic S; Lachance L; Ben-David S; Brown M; Iyer S; Chaim G; Soklaridis S; Kidd SA; Halsall T; Mathias S; Henderson J
    Health Expect; 2020 Jun; 23(3):584-592. PubMed ID: 32170902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Researchers, Patients, and Stakeholders Evaluating Comparative-Effectiveness Research: A Mixed-Methods Study of the PCORI Reviewer Experience.
    Forsythe LP; Frank LB; Hemphill R; Tafari AT; Szydlowski V; Lauer M; Goertz C; Clauser S
    Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1161-1167. PubMed ID: 30314616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
    Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.