394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28173814)
1. The Human Oocyte Preservation Experience (HOPE) Registry: evaluation of cryopreservation techniques and oocyte source on outcomes.
Nagy ZP; Anderson RE; Feinberg EC; Hayward B; Mahony MC
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 28173814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes of a vitrified donor oocyte programme: A single UK centre experience.
Seshadri S; Saab W; Exeter H; Drew E; Petrie A; Davies M; Serhal P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():136-140. PubMed ID: 29709727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction].
Song WY; Sun YP; Jin HX; Xin ZM; Su YC; Guo YH; Chen ZJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 45(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 21029612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.
Bourdon M; Pocate-Cheriet K; Finet de Bantel A; Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Amar Hoffet A; Arbo E; Poulain M; Santulli P
Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1948-1964. PubMed ID: 31644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of 7515 same donor oocyte cycle fresh and cryopreserved-thawed oocytes in 609 donor oocyte recipient cycles: A single institution analysis.
Gursu T; Goksever Celik H; Eraslan A; Angun B; Ozaltin S; Yeh J; Bastu E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Oct; 277():110-115. PubMed ID: 36067608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolution of human oocyte cryopreservation: slow freezing versus vitrification.
Levi-Setti PE; Patrizio P; Scaravelli G
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2016 Dec; 23(6):445-450. PubMed ID: 27653002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human oocyte cryopreservation with slow freezing versus vitrification. Results from the National Italian Registry data, 2007-2011.
Levi Setti PE; Porcu E; Patrizio P; Vigiliano V; de Luca R; d'Aloja P; Spoletini R; Scaravelli G
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jul; 102(1):90-95.e2. PubMed ID: 24794316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
Zhu HY; Xue YM; Yang LY; Jiang LY; Ling C; Tong XM; Zhang SY
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.
Insogna IG; Lanes A; Lee MS; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH
JAMA; 2021 Jan; 325(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33433574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.
Luke B; Brown MB; Missmer SA; Spector LG; Leach RE; Williams M; Koch L; Smith YR; Stern JE; Ball GD; Schymura MJ
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):183-9. PubMed ID: 26577302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
Braga DP; Setti AS; Figueira RC; Azevedo Mde C; Iaconelli A; Lo Turco EG; Borges E
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
