These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28174364)
1. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction. Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial. Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces. Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage. Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Abbas NH; Sabet NE; Hassan IT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 27021451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Aboul-Ela SM; El-Beialy AR; El-Sayed KM; Selim EM; El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21300255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics. Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study. da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement. Hedayati Z; Hashemi SM; Zamiri B; Fattahi HR Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):588-92. PubMed ID: 17524619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Hybrid Orthodontic Treatment System (HOTS). Ikegami T; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lee W; Hibino K World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 20552104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. Al-Naoum F; Hajeer MY; Al-Jundi A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1880-9. PubMed ID: 25128922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of rate of canine retraction into recent extraction site with and without gingival fiberotomy: a clinical study. Kalra A; Jaggi N; Bansal M; Goel S; Medsinge SV; Abraham R; Jasoria G J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 24171983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial. Mowafy MI; Zaher AR Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of corticotomy-facilitated vs standard tooth-movement techniques in dogs with miniscrews as anchor units. Mostafa YA; Mohamed Salah Fayed M; Mehanni S; ElBokle NN; Heider AM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 19815161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of single versus multiple piezocisions on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial. Eid FY; El-Kalza AR BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):1024. PubMed ID: 39215274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament: a clinical study. Kumar KV; Umashankar K; Kumar DP; Kumar DP J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 23404006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of space closure rates between preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy T-loops: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Keng FY; Quick AN; Swain MV; Herbison P Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21415288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Canine Retraction Using a Closed Nickel Titanium Coil Spring and an Elastic Module. Khalid Z; Bangash AA; Anwar A; Pasha H; Amin E J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Sep; 28(9):695-698. PubMed ID: 30158036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors: Long-term periodontal and functional evaluation after orthodontic space closure with first premolar intrusion and canine extrusion. Rosa M; Lucchi P; Ferrari S; Zachrisson BU; Caprioglio A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Mar; 149(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 26926021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]