These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28174364)

  • 41. Friction versus frictionless mechanics during maxillary en-masse retraction in adult patients with Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a randomized clinical trial.
    Magdi S; Abdelsayed FA; Aboulfotouh MH; Fahim FH
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 39011819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical investigation of periodontal ligament distraction osteogenesis for rapid orthodontic canine retraction.
    Kumar PS; Saxena R; Patil S; Keluskar KM; Nagaraj K; Kotrashetti SM
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 20043550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Low-level laser therapy increases interleukin-1β in gingival crevicular fluid and enhances the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
    Varella AM; Revankar AV; Patil AK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):535-544.e5. PubMed ID: 30268264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of direct and indirect skeletal anchorage systems combined with 2 canine retraction techniques.
    Ozkan S; Bayram M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):763-770. PubMed ID: 27871702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.
    Samrit V; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Seith A; Malhotra V
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 23304969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
    Hedayati Z; Shomali M
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
    da Costa Monini A; Júnior LGG; Vianna AP; Martins RP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1047-1053. PubMed ID: 27246754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interseptal bone reduction on the rate of maxillary canine retraction.
    Leethanakul C; Kanokkulchai S; Pongpanich S; Leepong N; Charoemratrote C
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):839-45. PubMed ID: 24592904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Orthodontic tooth movement after extraction of previously autotransplanted maxillary canines and ridge augmentation.
    Collett AR; Fletcher B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):699-704. PubMed ID: 11113806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
    Bokas J; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Alkaline phosphatase activity in gingival crevicular fluid during human orthodontic tooth movement.
    Perinetti G; Paolantonio M; D'Attilio M; D'Archivio D; Tripodi D; Femminella B; Festa F; Spoto G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):548-56. PubMed ID: 12439484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of maxillary canine retraction into healed and recent extraction sites using cone beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial.
    Almaasarani SG; Rajeh N
    Angle Orthod; 2023 Jul; 93(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 37017438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of piezocision and laser-assisted flapless corticotomy in the acceleration of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Alfawal AMH; Hajeer MY; Ajaj MA; Hamadah O; Brad B
    Head Face Med; 2018 Feb; 14(1):4. PubMed ID: 29454369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study.
    Youssef M; Ashkar S; Hamade E; Gutknecht N; Lampert F; Mir M
    Lasers Med Sci; 2008 Jan; 23(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 17361391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Efficacy of elastic memory chains versus nickel-titanium coil springs in canine retraction: A two-center split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Khanemasjedi M; Moradinejad M; Javidi P; Niknam O; Jahromi NH; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):561-574. PubMed ID: 29153282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The drum spring (DS) retractor: constant and continuous force for canine retraction.
    Darendeliler MA; Darendeliler H; Uner O
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):115-30. PubMed ID: 9183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Efficacy of the Nance appliance as an anchorage-reinforcement method.
    Al-Awadhi EA; Garvey TM; Alhag M; Claffey NM; O'Connell B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 25726400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.