These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy. Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Aortic valve operations through an upper partial sternotomy]. Kiyama H; Imazeki T; Irie Y; Katayama Y; Murai N; Sato Y; Hata I; Gon S Kyobu Geka; 1999 Jul; 52(7):519-24; discussion 525-7. PubMed ID: 10402777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis. Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement. Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. J-shaped versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement with minimal extracorporeal circuit. Yilmaz A; Sjatskig J; van Boven WJ; Waanders FG; Kelder JC; Sonker U; Kloppenburg GT Scand Cardiovasc J; 2011 Dec; 45(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 21854091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term follow up with the 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis: clinical and echocardiographic results. Concistrè G; Miceli A; Marchi F; Farneti P; Chiaramonti F; Solinas M; Glauber AG J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Nov; 22(6):817-23. PubMed ID: 24597403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Rodríguez-Caulo EA; Guijarro-Contreras A; Otero-Forero J; Mataró MJ; Sánchez-Espín G; Guzón A; Porras C; Such M; Ordóñez A; Melero-Tejedor JM; Jiménez-Navarro M Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 29454380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients. Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †. Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of sutureless aortic valves in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: an evolution of the surgical technique. Pfeiffer S; Dell'aquila AM; Vogt F; Kalisnik JM; Sirch J; Fischlein T; Santarpino G J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 27385418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the femoral cannulation for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement necessary? Cuenca J; Rodriguez-Delgadillo MA; Valle JV; Campos V; Herrera JM; Rodriguez F; Portela F; Sorribas F; Juffe A Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S111-4. PubMed ID: 9814804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis. Dalén M; Biancari F; Rubino AS; Santarpino G; Glaser N; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Juvonen T; Deste W; Pollari F; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Gatti G; Pappalardo A; Svenarud P; Sartipy U Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 25653252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimal access median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement in elderly patients. Alassar Y; Yildirim Y; Pecha S; Detter C; Deuse T; Reichenspurner H J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 8():103. PubMed ID: 23601376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. Borger MA; Moustafine V; Conradi L; Knosalla C; Richter M; Merk DR; Doenst T; Hammerschmidt R; Treede H; Dohmen P; Strauch JT Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 99(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25441065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [MINIMALLY INVASIVE AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES]. Kamiya H Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 117(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 27295771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative planning of left-sided valve surgery with 3D computed tomography reconstruction models: sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach? Heuts S; Maessen JG; Sardari Nia P Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 May; 22(5):587-93. PubMed ID: 26826714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a transverse sternotomy: a word of caution. Bridgewater B; Steyn RS; Ray S; Hooper T Heart; 1998 Jun; 79(6):605-7. PubMed ID: 10078090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcomes following minimal invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity match analysis. Gasparovic I; Artemiou P; Hudec V; Hulman M Bratisl Lek Listy; 2017; 118(8):479-484. PubMed ID: 29050486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]