BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1690 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28175316)

  • 1. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial.
    Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; Eijkemans MJC; Mochtar MH; van Golde RJT; Hoek A; Kuchenbecker WKH; Fleischer K; de Bruin JP; Groen H; van Wely M; Lambalk CB; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2485-2495. PubMed ID: 29121350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 2: The predicted hyper responder.
    Oudshoorn SC; van Tilborg TC; Eijkemans MJC; Oosterhuis GJE; Friederich J; van Hooff MHA; van Santbrink EJP; Brinkhuis EA; Smeenk JMJ; Kwee J; de Koning CH; Groen H; Lambalk CB; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2506-2514. PubMed ID: 29121269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Bryndorf T; Løssl K; Roskær J; Holland T; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1253-64. PubMed ID: 27060174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).
    Ngwenya O; Lensen SF; Vail A; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJ; Wilkinson J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 Jan; 1(1):CD012693. PubMed ID: 38174816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Müllerian hormone.
    Hamdine O; Eijkemans MJ; Lentjes EW; Torrance HL; Macklon NS; Fauser BC; Broekmans FJ
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):170-8. PubMed ID: 25355590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).
    Lensen SF; Wilkinson J; Leijdekkers JA; La Marca A; Mol BWJ; Marjoribanks J; Torrance H; Broekmans FJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD012693. PubMed ID: 29388198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients.
    Qiao J; Zhang Y; Liang X; Ho T; Huang HY; Kim SH; Goethberg M; Mannaerts B; Arce JC
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Aug; 36(9):2452-2462. PubMed ID: 34179971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 1: The predicted poor responder.
    van Tilborg TC; Torrance HL; Oudshoorn SC; Eijkemans MJC; Koks CAM; Verhoeve HR; Nap AW; Scheffer GJ; Manger AP; Schoot BC; Sluijmer AV; Verhoeff A; Groen H; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2496-2505. PubMed ID: 29121326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders.
    Humaidan P; Chin W; Rogoff D; D'Hooghe T; Longobardi S; Hubbard J; Schertz J;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):544-555. PubMed ID: 28137754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BEYOND: a randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of individualized follitropin delta dosing in a GnRH agonist versus antagonist protocol during the first ovarian stimulation cycle.
    Lobo R; Soerdal T; Ekerhovd E; Cohlen B; Porcu E; Schenk M; Shufaro Y; Smeenk J; Suerdieck MB; Pinton P; Pinborg A;
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38723189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Drakopoulos P; Vuong TNL; Ho NAV; Vaiarelli A; Ho MT; Blockeel C; Camus M; Lam AT; van de Vijver A; Humaidan P; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2225-2233. PubMed ID: 29040589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH.
    Lan VT; Linh NK; Tuong HM; Wong PC; Howles CM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 23953069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.
    Vuong TN; Phung HT; Ho MT
    Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1188-95. PubMed ID: 25740882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF.
    Massin N; Abdennebi I; Porcu-Buisson G; Chevalier N; Descat E; Piétin-Vialle C; Goro S; Brussieux M; Pinto M; Pasquier M; Bry-Gauillard H
    Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):927-937. PubMed ID: 36864699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
    Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized, controlled, first-in-patient trial of choriogonadotropin beta added to follitropin delta in women undergoing ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol.
    Fernández Sánchez M; Višnová H; Larsson P; Yding Andersen C; Filicori M; Blockeel C; Pinborg A; Khalaf Y; Mannaerts B;
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1161-1174. PubMed ID: 35451013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF.
    Friis Petersen J; Løkkegaard E; Andersen LF; Torp K; Egeberg A; Hedegaard L; Nysom D; Nyboe Andersen A
    Hum Reprod Open; 2019; 2019(1):hoz003. PubMed ID: 30895268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ovarian response is associated with anogenital distance in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.
    Fabregues F; González-Foruria I; Peñarrubia J; Carmona F
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1696-1704. PubMed ID: 30016431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 85.