These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 281762)

  • 1. Reasons for replacement of amalgam dental restorations.
    Dahl JE; Eriksen HM
    Scand J Dent Res; 1978 Sep; 86(5):404-7. PubMed ID: 281762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Amalgam as the measure in filling therapy. A determination of its place].
    Barbakow F; Ackermann M; Krejci I; Lutz F
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(11):1341-50. PubMed ID: 7984992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Amalgam. V. A durable restoration material?].
    Penning C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 May; 100(5):225-8. PubMed ID: 11822151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark.
    Qvist V; Thylstrup A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Dec; 44(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 3469862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative clinical study of amalgam fillings].
    Szabó J; Herczegh B; Márk D; Tóth E; Bánóczy J
    Fogorv Sz; 1998; 91(8-9):285-91. PubMed ID: 9729672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
    Allander L; Birkhed D; Bratthall D
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The effect of contact fillings with amalgam on the periodontium in radiological investigations].
    Wójtowicz D; Olszowy M
    Czas Stomatol; 1974 Jan; 27(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 4521492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causative factors resulting in the placement of dental restorations: A survey of 8891 restorations.
    Barnes GP; Carter HG; Hall JB
    Mil Med; 1973 Nov; 138(11):736 passim. PubMed ID: 4201993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 9083578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of zinc-containing and zinc-free amalgam restorations.
    Watson PA; Philips RW; Swartz ML; Gilmore HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 May; 29(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 4513306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Motives for placement and replacement of dental restoration].
    Franco EB; Pascotto RC
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 2135430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-sectional clinical study of quality of amalgam restorations, oral health and prevalence of recurrent caries.
    Eriksen HM; Bjertness E; Hansen BF
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1986 Feb; 14(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 3514106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries.
    Fedorowicz Z; Nasser M; Wilson N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007517. PubMed ID: 19821423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of the quality of proximal restorations with plastic materials: radiographic study].
    Karimi Z; Kessa S; Chala S; Abdallaoui F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Sep; 38(151):5-12. PubMed ID: 26930769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.