163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28176243)
1. The extent to which standardized uptake values reflect FDG phosphorylation in the liver and spleen as functions of time after injection of
Keramida G; Anagnostopoulos CD; Peters AM
EJNMMI Res; 2017 Dec; 7(1):13. PubMed ID: 28176243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tissue standardized uptake value is a closer surrogate of blood fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose clearance after division by blood standardized uptake value, illustrated in brain and liver.
Keramida G; Peters AM
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 May; 40(5):552-554. PubMed ID: 30973842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Static and Dynamic
Braune A; Hofheinz F; Bluth T; Kiss T; Wittenstein J; Scharffenberg M; Kotzerke J; Gama de Abreu M
J Nucl Med; 2019 Nov; 60(11):1629-1634. PubMed ID: 31053684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hepato-splenic axis: hepatic and splenic metabolic activities are linked.
Keramida G; Dunford A; Kaya G; Anagnostopoulos CD; Peters AM
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018; 8(3):228-238. PubMed ID: 30042872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between regional hepatic glucose metabolism and regional distribution of hepatic fat.
Dunford A; Keramida G; Singh N; Aplin M; Peters AM
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Mar; 40(3):212-218. PubMed ID: 30628944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET.
Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ
J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of hyperglycemia on brain and liver
Viglianti BL; Wong KK; Wimer SM; Parameswaran A; Nan B; Ky C; Townsend DM; Rubello D; Frey KA; Gross MD
Biomed Pharmacother; 2017 Apr; 88():1038-1045. PubMed ID: 28192877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [
Zhuang M; Karakatsanis NA; Dierckx RAJO; Zaidi H
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Apr; 21(2):317-327. PubMed ID: 29956119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does whole-body Patlak
Fahrni G; Karakatsanis NA; Di Domenicantonio G; Garibotto V; Zaidi H
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4812-4821. PubMed ID: 30689031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of SUV, tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR), and dual time point measurements for assessment of the metabolic uptake rate in FDG PET.
Hofheinz F; Hoff Jv; Steffen IG; Lougovski A; Ego K; Amthauer H; Apostolova I
EJNMMI Res; 2016 Dec; 6(1):53. PubMed ID: 27334609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences.
Beaulieu S; Kinahan P; Tseng J; Dunnwald LK; Schubert EK; Pham P; Lewellen B; Mankoff DA
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 44(7):1044-50. PubMed ID: 12843218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-invasive estimation of the net influx constant using the standardized uptake value for quantification of FDG uptake of tumours.
Sadato N; Tsuchida T; Nakaumra S; Waki A; Uematsu H; Takahashi N; Hayashi N; Yonekura Y; Ishii Y
Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Jun; 25(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 9618569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multifunctional profiling of non-small cell lung cancer using 18F-FDG PET/CT and volume perfusion CT.
Sauter AW; Winterstein S; Spira D; Hetzel J; Schulze M; Mueller M; Pfannenberg C; Claussen CD; Klotz E; Hann von Weyhern C; Horger MS
J Nucl Med; 2012 Apr; 53(4):521-9. PubMed ID: 22414637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative evaluation of skeletal tumours with dynamic FDG PET: SUV in comparison to Patlak analysis.
Wu H; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Heichel TO; Lehner B; Bernd L; Ewerbeck V; Burger C; Strauss LG
Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 Jun; 28(6):704-10. PubMed ID: 11440030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hepatic glucose utilization in hepatic steatosis and obesity.
Keramida G; Hunter J; Peters AM
Biosci Rep; 2016 Dec; 36(6):. PubMed ID: 27653524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal values for
Dias AH; Hansen AK; Munk OL; Gormsen LC
EJNMMI Res; 2022 Mar; 12(1):15. PubMed ID: 35254514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of hepatic steatosis on liver FDG uptake measured in mean standard uptake values.
Abele JT; Fung CI
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):917-24. PubMed ID: 20177102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simplified quantification of FDG metabolism in tumors using the autoradiographic method is less dependent on the acquisition time than SUV.
Burger IA; Burger C; Berthold T; Buck A
Nucl Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 38(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 21843779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG.
Chen W; Cloughesy T; Kamdar N; Satyamurthy N; Bergsneider M; Liau L; Mischel P; Czernin J; Phelps ME; Silverman DH
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jun; 46(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 15937304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size.
Kurland BF; Muzi M; Peterson LM; Doot RK; Wangerin KA; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 57(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 26493206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
