BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28177646)

  • 1. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Cost-Effectiveness of Using Private and Medicare Insurance in Community-Based Health Care Facilities.
    Hunter SA; Morris C; Nelson K; Snyder BJ; Poulton TB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1171-1175. PubMed ID: 28177646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment.
    Giess CS; Pourjabbar S; Ip IK; Lacson R; Alper E; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):929-934. PubMed ID: 28639832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
    Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Implementation: Considerations for Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Bundled Payment Models.
    Fleming MM; Hughes DR; Golding LP; McGinty GB; MacFarlane D; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jul; 16(7):902-907. PubMed ID: 30679104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.
    Sharma N; McMahon M; Haigh I; Chen Y; Dall BJG
    Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30888932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
    Caumo F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Brunelli S; Bricolo P; Cugola L; Gennaro G
    Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 33170101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
    Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in a US Medicaid Population.
    Miller JD; Bonafede MM; Herschorn SD; Pohlman SK; Troeger KA; Fajardo LL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Apr; 14(4):467-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28139412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surveillance Mammography After Breast Conservation Therapy: Is Tomosynthesis Worth It?
    Hasan S; Gresswell S; Colosimo B; Weinberger K; Anderson S; Abel S; Bigbee M; Shindel B; Hilton C; Julian T; Trombetta M
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Aug; 42(8):682-686. PubMed ID: 31313678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial experience with combination digital breast tomosynthesis plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environment.
    Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
    J Clin Imaging Sci; 2014; 4():9. PubMed ID: 24744966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding Regional Variation in the Cost of Breast Cancer Screening Among Privately Insured Women in the United States.
    Kunst N; Long JB; Xu X; Busch SH; Kyanko KA; Lindau ST; Richman IB; Gross CP
    Med Care; 2021 May; 59(5):437-443. PubMed ID: 33560712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Dang PA; Wang A; Senapati GM; Ip IK; Lacson R; Khorasani R; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):701-706. PubMed ID: 31613659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Hodgson R; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Harvey SC; Edwards M; Shaikh J; Arber M; Glanville J
    Breast; 2016 Jun; 27():52-61. PubMed ID: 27212700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection Rates for Benign and Malignant Diagnoses on Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Statewide Mammography Registry Study.
    Fujii MH; Herschorn SD; Sowden M; Hotaling EL; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Sprague BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):706-711. PubMed ID: 30673339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
    Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reader study comparing prospective tomosynthesis interpretations with retrospective readings of the corresponding FFDM examinations.
    Rose SL; Tidwell AL; Ice MF; Nordmann AS; Sexton R; Song R
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1204-10. PubMed ID: 25107868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.