269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28177897)
1. Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Xue J; Qin Z; Cai H; Zhang C; Li X; Xu W; Wang J; Xu Z; Yu B; Xu T; Zou Q
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23322-23336. PubMed ID: 28177897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shen PF; Zhu YC; Wei WR; Li YZ; Yang J; Li YT; Li DM; Wang J; Zeng H
Asian J Androl; 2012 Mar; 14(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 22101942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Tu X; Liu Z; Chang T; Qiu S; Xu H; Bao Y; Yang L; Wei Q
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e860-e870. PubMed ID: 31281065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.
Huang GL; Kang CH; Lee WC; Chiang PH
BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31660936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches.
Loy LM; Lim GH; Leow JJ; Lee CH; Tan TW; Tan CH
Urol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):650-660. PubMed ID: 32505458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy versus transrectal route in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu Q; Tu X; Zhang C; Ye J; Lin T; Liu Z; Yang L; Qiu S; Bao Y; Wei Q
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Jun; 27(2):212-221. PubMed ID: 37783837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients.
Lu M; Luo Y; Wang Y; Yu J; Zheng H; Yang Z
BMC Urol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 36709292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uleri A; Baboudjian M; Tedde A; Gallioli A; Long-Depaquit T; Palou J; Basile G; Gaya JM; Sanguedolce F; Lughezzani G; Rajwa P; Pradere B; Roupret M; Briganti A; Ploussard G; Breda A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):621-628. PubMed ID: 37634971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
Di Franco CA; Jallous H; Porru D; Giliberto GL; Cebrelli T; Tinelli C; Rovereto B
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 28403597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer.
Kawakami S; Yamamoto S; Numao N; Ishikawa Y; Kihara K; Fukui I
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 17681062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.
Tewes S; Peters I; Tiemeyer A; Peperhove M; Hartung D; Pertschy S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Hueper K
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2176471. PubMed ID: 29094042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation at the same institution.
Cerruto MA; Vianello F; D'Elia C; Artibani W; Novella G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2014 Dec; 86(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25641452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.
Roberts MJ; Macdonald A; Ranasinghe S; Bennett H; Teloken PE; Harris P; Paterson D; Coughlin G; Dunglison N; Esler R; Gardiner RA; Elliott T; Gordon L; Yaxley J
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Mar; 24(1):169-176. PubMed ID: 32759972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Pennisi M
Anticancer Res; 2017 Jun; 37(6):3291-3294. PubMed ID: 28551679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Nandurkar R; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Barletta F; Leni R; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Hanegbi U; Landaumailto A; Snow R; Apfelbeck M; Kretschmer A; van den Bergh R; Novara G; Briganti A; Dal Moro F; Gandaglia G
J Urol; 2022 Oct; 208(4):830-837. PubMed ID: 36082555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted prostate biopsy using Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method: A multicenter study of Turkish Urooncology Association.
Koparal MY; Sözen TS; Karşıyakalı N; Aslan G; Akdoğan B; Şahin B; Türkeri L;
Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):425-432. PubMed ID: 34927740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
