648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28178606)
1. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of vascular surgery Web sites on the Internet.
Grewal P; Williams B; Alagaratnam S; Neffendorf J; Soobrah R
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 56(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 22801107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Arteriovenous Fistula for dialysis - Let's Google it. Readability and quality of online information.
Bresler RM; Lynch NP; Connolly M; Keelan S; Richter L; McHugh SM; Naughton PA
Surgeon; 2021 Feb; 19(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 32340801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the quality of online information for patients with carotid disease.
Keogh CJ; McHugh SM; Clarke Moloney M; Hannigan A; Healy DA; Burke PE; Kavanagh EG; Grace PA; Walsh SR
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 24380751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy.
McInnes N; Haglund BJ
Inform Health Soc Care; 2011 Dec; 36(4):173-89. PubMed ID: 21332302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
Grewal P; Alagaratnam S
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality and readability of online patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Bailey MA; Coughlin PA; Sohrabi S; Griffin KJ; Rashid ST; Troxler MA; Scott DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 56(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22521801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and readability of online information on hand osteoarthritis.
Hong SW; Kang JH; Park JH; Park HJ; Kim E
Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231169297. PubMed ID: 36995242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear implantation: An assessment of quality and readability of web-based information aimed at patients.
Seymour N; Lakhani R; Hartley B; Cochrane L; Jephson C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):321-5. PubMed ID: 26154560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Information about oral cancer on the Internet: our patients cannot understand it.
Varela-Centelles P; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Seoane J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 25703184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.
Spiers H; Amin N; Lakhani R; Martin AJ; Patel PM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e470-e475. PubMed ID: 28885483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing the Readability of Online Urogynecologic Patient Information.
Stewart JR; Heit MH; Meriwether KV; Hobson DT; Francis SL
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29117016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Online patient resources for breast reconstruction: an analysis of readability.
Vargas CR; Koolen PGL; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Sep; 134(3):406-413. PubMed ID: 25158700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
