97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28179350)
41. Breast cancer in Brazil: Screening program and surgical approach.
Nascimento JHF; Vieira ATS; Souza Filho BM; Tomaz SC; Delgado Bocanegra RE; Melo Costa VS; Johnson LFP; Gusmão-Cunha A; Silva Neto MM; Andrade AB
Cancer Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 73():101970. PubMed ID: 34216956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution.
Pass H; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Decker D; Pettinga J; Ingold J; Benitez P; Neumann K; Rebner M; Dekhne N; Martinez A
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 15305400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Trends in breast cancer during three decades in Denmark: stage at diagnosis, surgical management and survival.
Jensen AR; Madsen AH; Overgaard J
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 18465319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Axillary node dissection in patients with breast cancer diagnosed through the Ontario Breast Screening Program: a need for minimally invasive techniques.
Singhal H; O'Malley FP; Tweedie E; Stitt L; Tonkin KS
Can J Surg; 1997 Oct; 40(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 9336528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Associations among socioeconomic status, patterns of care and outcomes in breast cancer patients in a universal health care system: Ontario's experience.
Kumachev A; Trudeau ME; Chan KK
Cancer; 2016 Mar; 122(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 26696022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Summaries for patients. Relationship of mammography use to size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in older women.
Ann Intern Med; 2002 Nov; 137(10):I33. PubMed ID: 12435236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Impact of screening on clinicopathological features and treatment for invasive breast cancer: results of two national surveys.
Cutuli B; Dalenc F; Cottu PH; Gligorov J; Guastalla JP; Petit T; Amrate A
Cancer Radiother; 2015 Aug; 19(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 26188735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Proportion of women with self-reported opportunistic mammography before organized screening.
Heikkinen S; Miettinen J; Koskenvuo M; Huovinen R; Pitkäniemi J; Sarkeala T; Malila N
Acta Oncol; 2016 Jul; 55(7):865-9. PubMed ID: 27144814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors.
Lash TL; Fox MP; Buist DS; Wei F; Field TS; Frost FJ; Geiger AM; Quinn VP; Yood MU; Silliman RA
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jul; 25(21):3001-6. PubMed ID: 17548838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Mammography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines.
Shen N; Hammonds LS; Madsen D; Dale P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3066-71. PubMed ID: 21863364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Age-related socio-economic and geographic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis: a population-based study.
Dialla PO; Arveux P; Ouedraogo S; Pornet C; Bertaut A; Roignot P; Janoray P; Poillot ML; Quipourt V; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS
Eur J Public Health; 2015 Dec; 25(6):966-72. PubMed ID: 25829506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Trends in surgery for screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a national screening programme.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Roumen RM; Jansen FH; Voogd AC
Br J Surg; 2014 Jul; 101(8):949-58. PubMed ID: 24828281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer.
Aragon R; Morgan J; Wong JH; Lum S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3137-42. PubMed ID: 21947591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]