253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28179372)
1. Graphics and statistics for cardiology: clinical prediction rules.
Woodward M; Tunstall-Pedoe H; Peters SA
Heart; 2017 Apr; 103(7):538-545. PubMed ID: 28179372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Graphics and statistics for cardiology: survival analysis.
May S; McKnight B
Heart; 2017 Mar; 103(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 28082309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Performance measures for prediction models and markers: evaluation of predictions and classifications].
Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 21763052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wearable technology for cardiology: An update and framework for the future.
Pevnick JM; Birkeland K; Zimmer R; Elad Y; Kedan I
Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2018 Feb; 28(2):144-150. PubMed ID: 28818431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. To Be or Not to Be a Multimodality Imager!
Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):715-717. PubMed ID: 28595845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Interventional Cardiology: From Decision-Making Aid to Advanced Interventional Procedure Assistance.
Sardar P; Abbott JD; Kundu A; Aronow HD; Granada JF; Giri J
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(14):1293-1303. PubMed ID: 31320024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of the Pathologic Gleason Score to Inform a Personalized Management Program for Prostate Cancer.
Coley RY; Zeger SL; Mamawala M; Pienta KJ; Carter HB
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 27523594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision Tools to Improve Personalized Care in Cardiovascular Disease: Moving the Art of Medicine Toward Science.
Yeh RW; Kramer DB
Circulation; 2017 Mar; 135(12):1097-1100. PubMed ID: 28320801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 2019 Methodology for Creating Expert Consensus Decision Pathways: A Report of the American College of Cardiology.
Januzzi JL; Ahmad T; Binder LG; Hucker WJ; Kumbhani DJ; Maddox TM; Marine JE; Morris PB
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 74(8):1138-1150. PubMed ID: 31350041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records.
Pike MM; Decker PA; Larson NB; St Sauver JL; Takahashi PY; Roger VL; Rocca WA; Miller VM; Olson JE; Pathak J; Bielinski SJ
J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2016 Jun; 9(3):214-222. PubMed ID: 26960568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk prediction tools in cardiovascular disease prevention: A report from the ESC Prevention of CVD Programme led by the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) in collaboration with the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP).
Rossello X; Dorresteijn JA; Janssen A; Lambrinou E; Scherrenberg M; Bonnefoy-Cudraz E; Cobain M; Piepoli MF; Visseren FL; Dendale P; This Paper Is A Co-Publication Between European Journal Of Preventive Cardiology European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care And European Journal Of Cardiovascular Nursing
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 26(14):1534-1544. PubMed ID: 31234648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.
Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; D'Agostino RB; Vasan RS
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12. PubMed ID: 17569110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Statistically Corrected Operative Risk Evaluation (AAA SCORE) for predicting mortality after open and endovascular interventions.
Ambler GK; Gohel MS; Mitchell DC; Loftus IM; Boyle JR;
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 61(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24985535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the weighted area under the net benefit curve for decision curve analysis.
Talluri R; Shete S
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():94. PubMed ID: 27431531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment and improvement of figures to visually convey benefit and risk of stroke thrombolysis.
Gadhia J; Starkman S; Ovbiagele B; Ali L; Liebeskind D; Saver JL
Stroke; 2010 Feb; 41(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 20056928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation and Comparison of Seven Mortality Prediction Models for Hospitalized Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.
Lagu T; Pekow PS; Shieh MS; Stefan M; Pack QR; Kashef MA; Atreya AR; Valania G; Slawsky MT; Lindenauer PK
Circ Heart Fail; 2016 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 27514749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Putting risk prediction in perspective: relative utility curves.
Baker SG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Nov; 101(22):1538-42. PubMed ID: 19843888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enterococcal bloodstream infection. Design and validation of a mortality prediction rule.
Pérez-García A; Landecho MF; Beunza JJ; Conde-Estévez D; Horcajada JP; Grau S; Gea A; Mauleón E; Sorli L; Gómez J; Terradas R; Lucena JF; Alegre F; Huerta A; Del Pozo JL
Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Feb; 70(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 26817569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do Risk-Enhancing Factors Enhance Risk Estimation?
Stern RH; Brook RD
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006078. PubMed ID: 31718296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of a long-term cardiovascular disease risk prediction equation for low-incidence populations: the CAMUNI-MATISS Cohorts Collaboration study.
Veronesi G; Gianfagna F; Giampaoli S; Chambless LE; Grassi G; Cesana G; Ferrario MM
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1618-25. PubMed ID: 25501263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
