These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28179372)
21. Comparison of Coronary Artery Disease Consortium 1 and 2 Scores and Duke Clinical Score to Predict Obstructive Coronary Disease by Invasive Coronary Angiography. Almeida J; Fonseca P; Dias T; Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ribeiro J; Gama V Clin Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 39(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 26848812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterizing Decision-Analysis Performances of Risk Prediction Models Using ADAPT Curves. Lee WC; Wu YC Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jan; 95(2):e2477. PubMed ID: 26765451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A novel cardiovascular death prediction model for Chinese individuals: A prospective cohort study of 381,963 study participants. Hu WS; Lee JH; Tsai MK; Wen CP Atherosclerosis; 2017 Sep; 264():19-28. PubMed ID: 28753450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Graphics and Statistics for Cardiology: Data visualisation for meta-analysis. Kiran A; Crespillo AP; Rahimi K Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 27810865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Strengths and Opportunities of Network Medicine in Cardiovascular Diseases. Benincasa G; Marfella R; Della Mura N; Schiano C; Napoli C Circ J; 2020 Jan; 84(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31866635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction: comments on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond' by Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929). Chi YY; Zhou XH Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 17712782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Proposed research plan for the derivation of a new Cardiac Risk Index. Biccard B Anesth Analg; 2015 Mar; 120(3):543-553. PubMed ID: 25695572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Big Data in Cardiology. Shah RU; Rumsfeld JS Eur Heart J; 2017 Jun; 38(24):1865-1867. PubMed ID: 28863461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction: comments on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond' by M. J. Pencina et al., Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929). Greenland S Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 17729377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives. Steyerberg EW; Vedder MM; Leening MJ; Postmus D; D'Agostino RB; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):556-70. PubMed ID: 25042996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Neural networks as a tool to predict syncope risk in the Emergency Department. Costantino G; Falavigna G; Solbiati M; Casagranda I; Sun BC; Grossman SA; Quinn JV; Reed MJ; Ungar A; Montano N; Furlan R; Ippoliti R Europace; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1891-1895. PubMed ID: 28017935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Pooled Cohort Equations 3 Years On: Building a Stronger Foundation. Ridker PM; Cook NR Circulation; 2016 Dec; 134(23):1789-1791. PubMed ID: 27920070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and validation of a dynamic outcome prediction model for paracetamol-induced acute liver failure: a cohort study. Bernal W; Wang Y; Maggs J; Willars C; Sizer E; Auzinger G; Murphy N; Harding D; Elsharkawy A; Simpson K; Larsen FS; Heaton N; O'Grady J; Williams R; Wendon J Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Nov; 1(3):217-225. PubMed ID: 28404094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chagnon I; Bounameaux H; Aujesky D; Roy PM; Gourdier AL; Cornuz J; Perneger T; Perrier A Am J Med; 2002 Sep; 113(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 12361811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improvement of cardiovascular risk prediction: time to review current knowledge, debates, and fundamentals on how to assess test characteristics. Romanens M; Ackermann F; Spence JD; Darioli R; Rodondi N; Corti R; Noll G; Schwenkglenks M; Pencina M Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 17(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19952758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction? Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of a clinical prediction rule for tuberculous meningitis in adults in Lima, Peru. Solari L; Soto A; Van der Stuyft P Trop Med Int Health; 2018 Apr; 23(4):367-374. PubMed ID: 29446860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models. Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]