These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28179372)

  • 21. The atherosclerosis burden score (ABS): a convenient ultrasound-based score of peripheral atherosclerosis for coronary artery disease prediction.
    Yerly P; Marquès-Vidal P; Owlya R; Eeckhout E; Kappenberger L; Darioli R; Depairon M
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2015 Mar; 8(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 25771948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cardiovascular risk prediction in a population with the metabolic syndrome: Framingham vs. UKPDS algorithms.
    Zomer E; Liew D; Owen A; Magliano DJ; Ademi Z; Reid CM
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 22588087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Musical versus visual graphs: cross-modal equivalence in perception of time series data.
    Flowers JH; Hauer TA
    Hum Factors; 1995 Sep; 37(3):553-69. PubMed ID: 8566997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Precision Medicine and Personalized Medicine in Cardiovascular Disease.
    Currie G; Delles C
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1065():589-605. PubMed ID: 30051409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models.
    Cook NR; Paynter NP
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):237-58. PubMed ID: 21294152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cardiovascular risk assessment of pulmonary embolism with the GRACE risk score.
    Paiva LV; Providencia RC; Barra SN; Faustino AC; Botelho AM; Marques AL
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 Feb; 111(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 23168283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of illness severity scoring systems and risk prediction in vascular intensive care admissions.
    Dover M; Tawfick W; Hynes N; Sultan S
    Vascular; 2016 Aug; 24(4):390-403. PubMed ID: 26482428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Coronary Artery Disease Consortium 1 and 2 Scores and Duke Clinical Score to Predict Obstructive Coronary Disease by Invasive Coronary Angiography.
    Almeida J; Fonseca P; Dias T; Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ribeiro J; Gama V
    Clin Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 39(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 26848812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction: decision analysis to the rescue.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    Discov Med; 2012 Sep; 14(76):181-8. PubMed ID: 23021372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comments on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker' by M. Pencina, R. D'Agostino, R. D'Agostino Jr, R. Vasan, Statistics in Medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929).
    Kraemer HC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 18041049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterizing Decision-Analysis Performances of Risk Prediction Models Using ADAPT Curves.
    Lee WC; Wu YC
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jan; 95(2):e2477. PubMed ID: 26765451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Utility of Items of Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale as Predictors of Functional Outcomes at Three Months after Mild Ischemic Stroke.
    Choi JC; Kim BJ; Han MK; Lee SJ; Kang K; Park JM; Park SS; Park TH; Cho YJ; Hong KS; Lee KB; Lee J; Ryu WS; Kim DE; Nah HW; Kim DH; Cha JK; Kim JT; Choi KH; Oh MS; Yu KH; Lee BC; Jang MS; Lee JS; Lee J; Bae HJ;
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1306-1313. PubMed ID: 28318959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A novel cardiovascular death prediction model for Chinese individuals: A prospective cohort study of 381,963 study participants.
    Hu WS; Lee JH; Tsai MK; Wen CP
    Atherosclerosis; 2017 Sep; 264():19-28. PubMed ID: 28753450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Graphics and Statistics for Cardiology: Data visualisation for meta-analysis.
    Kiran A; Crespillo AP; Rahimi K
    Heart; 2017 Jan; 103(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 27810865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review.
    Siontis GC; Tzoulaki I; Siontis KC; Ioannidis JP
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e3318. PubMed ID: 22628003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strengths and Opportunities of Network Medicine in Cardiovascular Diseases.
    Benincasa G; Marfella R; Della Mura N; Schiano C; Napoli C
    Circ J; 2020 Jan; 84(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31866635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
    Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: Strengths and Limitations.
    Redon J
    High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev; 2016 Jun; 23(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 26993498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistical primer: checking model assumptions with regression diagnostics.
    Hickey GL; Kontopantelis E; Takkenberg JJM; Beyersdorf F
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 Jan; 28(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 30010875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neutrophil-Lympocyte Ratio and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Update.
    Koza Y
    Angiology; 2016 Feb; 67(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 25926472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.