152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28179685)
1. Science, lies and video-taped experiments.
Clark TD
Nature; 2017 Feb; 542(7640):139. PubMed ID: 28179685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Watch out for cheats in citation game.
Biagioli M
Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):201. PubMed ID: 27411599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
Silverman S
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple system of checks and balances to cut fraud.
Yang X; Eggan K; Seidel G; Jaenisch R; Melton D
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782. PubMed ID: 16482128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
Bentley P
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud offers big rewards for relatively little risk.
Fenning TM
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6973):393. PubMed ID: 14749800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fraud will out--or will it?
Tangney JP
New Sci; 1987 Aug; 115(1572):62-3. PubMed ID: 11645775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How far do you trust your colleagues?
Neufeld A
New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.
Begley CG; Buchan AM; Dirnagl U
Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):25-7. PubMed ID: 26333454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards for papers on cloning.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Each co-author should sign to reduce risk of fraud.
Yager K
Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7170):610. PubMed ID: 18046378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. China cracks down on fake peer reviews.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7659):464. PubMed ID: 28640278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science fraud: from patchwork mouse to patchwork data.
Weissmann G
FASEB J; 2006 Apr; 20(6):587-90. PubMed ID: 16581962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 1: the spectrum of deviant behavior in science.
Garfield E
Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(14):3-7. PubMed ID: 11649955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Allocating credit and blame in science.
Chubin DE
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
Kritchevsky D
Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help?
Gall T; Ioannidis JPA; Maniadis Z
PLoS Biol; 2017 Apr; 15(4):e2001846. PubMed ID: 28445470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
