These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28179685)

  • 21. Fraud and sloppiness in science.
    Schmaus W
    Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
    Garfield E
    Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
    Sovacool BK
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct.
    Hackett EJ
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):242-60. PubMed ID: 11653363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The joy of discovery.
    de Duve C
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S5. PubMed ID: 20944620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.
    Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stop ignoring misconduct.
    Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Retractions due to errors and frauds].
    Decullier E; Samson G; Huot L
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):847-52. PubMed ID: 22841376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fraud and secrecy: the twin perils of science.
    New Sci; 1983 Jun; 98(1361):712-3. PubMed ID: 11655551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The matter of standards. I. The individual scientist.
    Wilkins AS
    Bioessays; 2008 Sep; 30(9):795-7. PubMed ID: 18693276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A reprogramming rush.
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7186):388. PubMed ID: 18368078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Through the gaps.
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):335. PubMed ID: 23002451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tie funding to research integrity.
    Titus S; Bosch X
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):436-7. PubMed ID: 20651673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
    Pontille D; Torny D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fraud by scientists seen linked to competition.
    Russell C
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mystery fraud accusations.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7319):1020. PubMed ID: 20981065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Corporate culture has no place in academia.
    Hallonsten O
    Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7623):7. PubMed ID: 27708316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.