These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28179923)

  • 1. Transportation and Centering Ability of Neoniti and ProTaper Instruments; A CBCT Assessment.
    Madani Z; Soleymani A; Bagheri T; Moudi E; Bijani A; Rakhshan V
    Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28179923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An
    Shenoi PR; Luniya DA; Badole GP; Makade CS; Kubde R; Khode RT
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 28611329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
    Tambe VH; Nagmode PS; Abraham S; Patait M; Lahoti PV; Jaju N
    J Conserv Dent; 2014 Nov; 17(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 25506145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProTaper and SafeSider in Preparation of Curved Root Canals: A CBCT Evaluation.
    Delgoshayi N; Abbasi M; Bakhtiar H; Sakhdari S; Ghannad S; Ellini MR
    Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 29707022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Analysis of Canal Centering Ability of Different Single File Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography- An In-Vitro Study.
    Agarwal RS; Agarwal J; Jain P; Chandra A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC06-10. PubMed ID: 26155551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transportation and Centering Ability of Kedo-S Pediatric and Mtwo Instruments in Primary Teeth: A Cone-beam ComputedTomography Study.
    Haridoss S; Rakkesh KM; Swaminathan K
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(Suppl 1):S30-S34. PubMed ID: 35645489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 27054859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Root Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Mandibular Premolars Assessed Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Mamede-Neto I; Borges AH; Guedes OA; de Oliveira D; Pedro FL; Estrela C
    Open Dent J; 2017; 11():71-78. PubMed ID: 28357000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.
    Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2053-6. PubMed ID: 25301350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files.
    McRay B; Cox TC; Cohenca N; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
    Quintessence Int; 2014 Feb; 45(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24389561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidimensional Analysis of Curved Root Canal Preparation Using Continuous or Reciprocating Nickel-titanium Instruments.
    Mamede-Neto I; Borges ÁH; Alencar AHG; Duarte MAH; Sousa Neto MD; Estrela C
    Open Dent J; 2018; 12():32-45. PubMed ID: 29456772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Efficacy of NeoNiTi, ProTaper, and Reciproc Files in the Retreatment of Curved Root Canals: a CBCT Assessment.
    Adel M; Tofangchiha M; Rashvand E; Moutabha I; Roohi N; Reda R; Testarelli L
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2022 Dec; 56(4):351-362. PubMed ID: 36713275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.
    Karkehabadi H; Siahvashi Z; Shokri A; Haji Hasani N
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 34034735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation using WaveOne Gold and Neoniti single-file systems.
    Vallabhaneni S; Fatima K; Kumar TH
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(6):434-438. PubMed ID: 29430097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Root Canal Transportation by Neoniti and Reciproc Single-File Systems.
    Moazzami F; Khojastepour L; Nabavizadeh M; Seied Habashi M
    Iran Endod J; 2016; 11(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 27141215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
    Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Canal Centering Ability and Transportation after Preparation with Twisted File and Bio RaCe Instrumentation.
    Honardar K; Assadian H; Shahab S; Jafari Z; Kazemi A; Nazarimoghaddam K; Kharrazifard MJ; Labbaf H
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Jul; 11(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 25584056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measure and compare the Degree of Root Canal Transportation and Canal-centering ability of Twisted, ProTaper, and Conventional Stainless Steel K Files using Spiral Computed Tomography: An in vitro Study.
    Rejula F; Christalin R; Ahmed W; Dinakaran S; Gopinathan AS; Babu A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):463-469. PubMed ID: 28621275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternating versus continuous rotation: Root canal transportation and centering ratio with the ProTaper Next.
    González-Chapela J; Castelo-Baz P; Varela-Patiño P; Martín-Biedma B; Ruíz-Piñón M
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(4):255-259. PubMed ID: 29259363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.