These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28179935)
1. Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer to Two Pulp Capping Materials. Doozaneh M; Koohpeima F; Firouzmandi M; Abbassiyan F Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(1):103-107. PubMed ID: 28179935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin. Oskoee SS; Kimyai S; Bahari M; Motahari P; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22269237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro comparison of shear bond strength of a flowable composite resin and a single-component glass-ionomer to three different pulp-capping agents. Zarean P; Roozbeh R; Zarean P; Jahromi MZ; Broujeni PM Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(3):239-244. PubMed ID: 31577067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shear bond strength of calcium enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin with two different adhesive systems. Savadi Oskoee S; Bahari M; Kimyai S; Motahhari P; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Nov; 11(6):665-71. PubMed ID: 25628696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of bond strength of a composite resin with two different adhesive systems and a resin modified glass ionomer to calcium enriched mixture. Elmi M; Ehsani M; Esmaeili B; Khafri S J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(4):369-372. PubMed ID: 30122815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents. Ajami AA; Jafari Navimipour E; Savadi Oskoee S; Abed Kahnamoui M; Lotfi M; Daneshpooy M J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2013; 7(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 24082988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine. Altunsoy M; Tanrıver M; Ok E; Kucukyilmaz E J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1691-5. PubMed ID: 26238526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement with ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus. Tyagi N; Chaman C; Anand S; Dhull A; Prakash R; Tomar H J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 38514429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bond strength of composite resin to pulp capping biomaterials after application of three different bonding systems. Jaberi-Ansari Z; Mahdilou M; Ahmadyar M; Asgary S J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2013; 7(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 24082986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond strength of different restorative materials to light-curable mineral trioxide aggregate. Cantekin K J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 25823484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). Cantekin K; Avci S J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 25141202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The shear bond strength of MTA with three different types of adhesive systems: An in vitro study. Tyagi N; Chaman C; Tyagi SP; Singh UP; Sharma A J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 27099417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Mixed with Water and Water-based Gel Regarding Shear Bond Strength with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite. Kaul R; Choudhary A; Kour S; Singh A; Kumari N; Manish K J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):353-356. PubMed ID: 34267002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of setting time on bond strength of different bioactive pulp capping materials with dental adhesive]. Dong YT; Tian FC; Jia B; Zu B; Wang XY Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 29483723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems. Alzraikat H; Taha NA; Qasrawi D; Burrow MF Dent Mater J; 2016 Dec; 35(6):881-887. PubMed ID: 27680033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer to conditioned and unconditioned mineral trioxide aggregate surface: An in vitro study. Gulati S; Shenoy VU; Margasahayam SV J Conserv Dent; 2014 Sep; 17(5):440-3. PubMed ID: 25298644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Sindi AS J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S672-S675. PubMed ID: 34447178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Tricalcium Silicate-based Materials to Composite Resin with Two Different Adhesive Systems: An Kumar V; Showkat I; Manuja N; Chaudhary S; Sinha AA; Telgi CR Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 16(Suppl 3):272-277. PubMed ID: 38268635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Methacrylate- and Silorane-based Composite Resin Bonded to Resin-Modified Glass-ionomer Containing Micro- and Nano-hydroxyapatite. Sharafeddin F; Moradian M; Motamedi M J Dent (Shiraz); 2016 Jun; 17(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 27284560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Four Bioceramic Materials with Different Restorative Materials and Timings. Alqahtani AS; Sulimany AM; Alayad AS; Alqahtani AS; Bawazir OA Materials (Basel); 2022 Jul; 15(13):. PubMed ID: 35806792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]