These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28181032)

  • 1. Comprehensive evaluation of chemiluminescent immunoassays for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Makristathis A; Zeller I; Mitteregger D; Kundi M; Hirschl AM
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 Jul; 36(7):1253-1259. PubMed ID: 28181032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.
    Landry ML; Topal JE; Estis J; Katzenbach P; Nolan N; Sandlund J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 31776192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous Detection of
    Yoo IY; Song DJ; Huh HJ; Lee NY
    Ann Lab Med; 2019 Mar; 39(2):214-217. PubMed ID: 30430786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Based on Immunochromatography Testing and Toxigenic Culture Assay.
    Ohshima T; Osaki T; Yamamoto Y; Asai S; Miyachi H; Kamiya S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 56(12):. PubMed ID: 30232129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.
    Kvach EJ; Ferguson D; Riska PF; Landry ML
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19864479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: comparative study of two immuno enzyme assays with confirmation by PCR and culture followed by PCR ribotyping].
    Krůtová M; Matějková J; Zajac M; Hubáček P; Nyč O
    Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 2014 Jun; 63(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 25025672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the VIDAS glutamate dehydrogenase assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile.
    Shin BM; Lee EJ; Moon JW; Lee SY
    Anaerobe; 2016 Aug; 40():68-72. PubMed ID: 27282799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of simultaneous glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay on Clostridium difficile diagnosis and treatment in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in a university hospital of Brazil.
    Cançado GGL; Silva ROS; Nader AP; Lobato FCF; Vilela EG
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Feb; 33(2):393-396. PubMed ID: 28730697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.
    Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Kim H; Kim WH; Kim M; Jeong SH; Lee K
    Ann Lab Med; 2014 May; 34(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 24790912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
    Bamber AI; Fitzsimmons K; Cunniffe JG; Beasor CC; Mackintosh CA; Hobbs G
    Br J Biomed Sci; 2012; 69(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 23057158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.
    Savolainen R; Koskinen JM; Mentula S; Koskinen JO; Kaukoranta SS
    J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 31941691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.
    Sandlund J; Mills R; Griego-Fullbright C; Wagner A; Estis J; Bartolome A; Almazan A; Tam S; Biscocho S; Abusali S; Nolan N; Bishop JJ; Todd J; Young S
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Sep; 95(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 31129008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of antigen-positive toxin-negative enzyme immunoassay results for the diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.
    Akamatsu Y; Morishita S; Chikumi H; Okamoto R; Okada K; Kitaura T; Miyake N; Yamaguchi K; Nakamoto M; Shimohiro H; Takata M; Yamasaki A; Burioka N; Shimizu E
    J Med Invest; 2018; 65(1.2):131-135. PubMed ID: 29593183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time polymerase chain reaction correlates well with clinical diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Berry N; Sewell B; Jafri S; Puli C; Vagia S; Lewis AM; Davies D; Rees E; Ch'ng CL
    J Hosp Infect; 2014 Jun; 87(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 24795170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of toxigenic Clostridioides [Clostridium] difficile: Usefulness of two commercially available enzyme immunoassays and a PCR assay on stool samples and stool isolates.
    Legaria MC; Rollet R; Di Martino A; Castello L; Barberis C; Rossetti MA; Guardati MC; Fernández Canigia L; Carloni G; Litterio M; Rocchi M; Anchart EG; Trejo FM; Minnaard J; Klajn D; Predari SC
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 2018; 50(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 28988901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of laboratory tests for detection for Clostridioides difficile: A multicenter prospective study in Japan.
    Senoh M; Kato H; Honda H; Fukuda T; Tagashira Y; Horiuchi H; Chiba H; Suzuki D; Hosokawa N; Kitazono H; Norisue Y; Kume H; Mori N; Morikawa H; Kashiwagura S; Higuchi A; Kato H; Nakamura M; Ishiguro S; Morita S; Ishikawa H; Watanabe T; Kojima K; Yokomaku I; Bando T; Toimoto K; Moriya K; Kasahara K; Kitada S; Ogawa J; Saito H; Tominaga H; Shimizu Y; Masumoto F; Tadera K; Yoshida J; Kikuchi T; Yoshikawa I; Watanabe T; Honda M; Yokote K; Toyokawa T; Miyazato H; Nakama M; Mahe C; Reske K; Olsen MA; Dubberke ER
    Anaerobe; 2019 Dec; 60():102107. PubMed ID: 31647977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A two-step approach improves the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Kachrimanidou M; Tegou Z; Chasampalioti M; Arvaniti K; Protonotariou E; Skoura L
    J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Dec; 143():17-19. PubMed ID: 28970055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: Comparison of Techlab C. diff Quik Chek Complete, Xpert C. difficile, and multistep algorithmic approach.
    Seo JY; Jeong JH; Kim KH; Ahn JY; Park PW; Seo YH
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2017 Nov; 31(6):. PubMed ID: 28177534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of
    Senok AC; Aldosari KM; Alowaisheq RA; Abid OA; Alsuhaibani KA; Khan MA; Somily AM
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2017; 23(4):259-262. PubMed ID: 28721981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.