BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28181075)

  • 1. Harnessing the Potential of Wearable Activity Trackers for Heart Failure Self-Care.
    Alharbi M; Straiton N; Gallagher R
    Curr Heart Fail Rep; 2017 Feb; 14(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 28181075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating Motivational Interviewing and Habit Formation to Enhance the Effect of Activity Trackers on Healthy Adults' Activity Levels: Randomized Intervention.
    Ellingson LD; Lansing JE; DeShaw KJ; Peyer KL; Bai Y; Perez M; Phillips LA; Welk GJ
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e10988. PubMed ID: 30762582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experiences With Wearable Activity Data During Self-Care by Chronic Heart Patients: Qualitative Study.
    Andersen TO; Langstrup H; Lomborg S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e15873. PubMed ID: 32706663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study.
    Peng W; Li L; Kononova A; Cotten S; Kamp K; Bowen M
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22488. PubMed ID: 33464216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review.
    Alharbi M; Straiton N; Smith S; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
    Maturitas; 2019 Jun; 124():100-110. PubMed ID: 30910279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review.
    Chan A; Chan D; Lee H; Ng CC; Yeo AHL
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 160():104696. PubMed ID: 35121356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Review of Physical Activity Monitoring and Activity Trackers for Older Adults.
    Barton J; O'Flynn B; Tedesco S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():748-754. PubMed ID: 28873880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.
    Paré G; Leaver C; Bourget C
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e177. PubMed ID: 29720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change.
    Kononova A; Li L; Kamp K; Bowen M; Rikard RV; Cotten S; Peng W
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e9832. PubMed ID: 30950807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advantages and Limitations of Wearable Activity Trackers: Considerations for Patients and Clinicians.
    Walker RK; Hickey AM; Freedson PS
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Dec; 20(6):606-610. PubMed ID: 27857250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A wearable activity tracker intervention for promoting physical activity in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study.
    Heale LD; Dover S; Goh YI; Maksymiuk VA; Wells GD; Feldman BM
    Pediatr Rheumatol Online J; 2018 Oct; 16(1):66. PubMed ID: 30348203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Users' experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study.
    Maher C; Ryan J; Ambrosi C; Edney S
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):880. PubMed ID: 29141607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cancer Patients' Perception of Usefulness of Wearable Exercise Trackers.
    Ng A; Gupta E; Bansal S; Fontillas RC; Amos CE; Williams JL; Dibaj S; Bruera E
    PM R; 2021 Aug; 13(8):845-851. PubMed ID: 32844592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
    Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Wearable Trackers on Physical Activity in Healthy Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Tang MSS; Moore K; McGavigan A; Clark RA; Ganesan AN
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e15576. PubMed ID: 32706685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables.
    Henriksen A; Haugen Mikalsen M; Woldaregay AZ; Muzny M; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock LA; Grimsgaard S
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e110. PubMed ID: 29567635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Social Networkout": Connecting Social Features of Wearable Fitness Trackers with Physical Exercise.
    Zhu Y; Dailey SL; Kreitzberg D; Bernhardt J
    J Health Commun; 2017 Dec; 22(12):974-980. PubMed ID: 29173072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with validity of consumer-oriented wearable physical activity trackers: a meta-analysis.
    Leung W; Case L; Jung J; Yun J
    J Med Eng Technol; 2021 Apr; 45(3):223-236. PubMed ID: 33750250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of wearable fitness devices.
    Kaewkannate K; Kim S
    BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():433. PubMed ID: 27220855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Wearable Trackers' Ability to Estimate Sleep.
    Lee JM; Byun W; Keill A; Dinkel D; Seo Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jun; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 29914050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.