BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28181075)

  • 21. A qualitative evaluation of breast cancer survivors' acceptance of and preferences for consumer wearable technology activity trackers.
    Nguyen NH; Hadgraft NT; Moore MM; Rosenberg DE; Lynch C; Reeves MM; Lynch BM
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3375-3384. PubMed ID: 28540402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wearable activity trackers for promoting physical activity: A systematic meta-analytic review.
    Li C; Chen X; Bi X
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Aug; 152():104487. PubMed ID: 34020170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The utility of personal activity trackers (Fitbit Charge 2) on exercise capacity in patients post acute coronary syndrome [UP-STEP ACS Trial]: a randomised controlled trial protocol.
    Nogic J; Thein PM; Cameron J; Mirzaee S; Ihdayhid A; Nasis A
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Dec; 17(1):303. PubMed ID: 29284402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Wearable Activity Tracker Checklist for Healthcare (WATCH): a 12-point guide for the implementation of wearable activity trackers in healthcare.
    Szeto K; Arnold J; Maher C
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2024 Mar; 21(1):30. PubMed ID: 38481238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Physical Activity Trend eXtraction: A Framework for Extracting Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity Trends From Wearable Fitness Tracker Data.
    Faust L; Wang C; Hachen D; Lizardo O; Chawla NV
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e11075. PubMed ID: 30860488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Motivational Interviewing Tailored Interventions for Heart Failure (MITI-HF): study design and methods.
    Masterson Creber R; Patey M; Dickson VV; DeCesaris M; Riegel B
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Mar; 41():62-8. PubMed ID: 25559913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is it Time to Include Wearable Sleep Trackers in the Applied Psychologists' Toolbox?
    Menghini L; Balducci C; de Zambotti M
    Span J Psychol; 2024 Feb; 27():e8. PubMed ID: 38410074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wearable Activity Trackers in the Management of Rheumatic Diseases: Where Are We in 2020?
    Davergne T; Rakotozafiarison A; Servy H; Gossec L
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(17):. PubMed ID: 32854412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review.
    Ridgers ND; McNarry MA; Mackintosh KA
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Nov; 4(4):e129. PubMed ID: 27881359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
    An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Behavior Change Techniques Incorporated in Fitness Trackers: Content Analysis.
    Chia GLC; Anderson A; McLean LA
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jul; 7(7):e12768. PubMed ID: 31339101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impaired chronotropic response to physical activities in heart failure patients.
    Shen H; Zhao J; Zhou X; Li J; Wan Q; Huang J; Li H; Wu L; Yang S; Wang P
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 May; 17(1):136. PubMed ID: 28545575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors Influencing Exercise Engagement When Using Activity Trackers: Nonrandomized Pilot Study.
    Centi AJ; Atif M; Golas SB; Mohammadi R; Kamarthi S; Agboola S; Kvedar JC; Jethwani K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e11603. PubMed ID: 31651405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Behavior Change Techniques Present in Wearable Activity Trackers: A Critical Analysis.
    Mercer K; Li M; Giangregorio L; Burns C; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Apr; 4(2):e40. PubMed ID: 27122452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparisons of physical activity and sedentary behavior between owners and non-owners of commercial wearable devices.
    Yen HY; Huang HY
    Perspect Public Health; 2021 Mar; 141(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 33733947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current State of Commercial Wearable Technology in Physical Activity Monitoring 2015-2017.
    Bunn JA; Navalta JW; Fountaine CJ; Reece JD
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2018; 11(7):503-515. PubMed ID: 29541338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The efficacy of wearable activity tracking technology as part of a weight loss program: a systematic review.
    Cheatham SW; Stull KR; Fantigrassi M; Motel I
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2018 Apr; 58(4):534-548. PubMed ID: 28488834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review.
    Shin G; Jarrahi MH; Fei Y; Karami A; Gafinowitz N; Byun A; Lu X
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 May; 93():103153. PubMed ID: 30910623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient-centred home-based management of heart failure. Findings from a randomised clinical trial evaluating a tablet computer for self-care, quality of life and effects on knowledge.
    HÀgglund E; LyngÄ P; Frie F; Ullman B; Persson H; Melin M; Hagerman I
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2015 Aug; 49(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 25968968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation.
    Sirard JR; Masteller B; Freedson PS; Mendoza A; Hickey A
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e250. PubMed ID: 28724509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.