These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Cervical Screening Results Leading to Detection of Adenocarcinoma in Situ of the Uterine Cervix. Srisomboon S; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):377-382. PubMed ID: 30803195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix following LLETZ (large loop excision of the transformation zone) for adenocarcinoma in situ. Kennedy AW; elTabbakh GH; Biscotti CV; Wirth S Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):274-7. PubMed ID: 7622120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Follow-up of women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ treated by conization: A single centre clinical experience. Adolph L; Mann A; Liu XQ; Roberts L; Robinson C; Popowich S; Dean E; Kean S; Fischer G; Altman AD Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Aug; 187():74-79. PubMed ID: 38733955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision. Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Human papillomavirus (HPV) test and PAP smear as predictors of outcome in conservatively treated adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. Costa S; Negri G; Sideri M; Santini D; Martinelli G; Venturoli S; Pelusi C; Syrjanen S; Syrjanen K; Pelusi G Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 17481701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prospective management of stage IA(1) cervical adenocarcinoma by conization alone to preserve fertility: a preliminary report. Schorge JO; Lee KR; Sheets EE Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 10926806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Risk of Recurrence After Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3 and Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Cervix: Recurrence of CIN 3 and AIS of Cervix. Swift BE; Wang L; Jembere N; Kupets R J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 32384365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effect of Cryotherapy vs Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure on Cervical Disease Recurrence Among Women With HIV and High-Grade Cervical Lesions in Kenya: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Greene SA; De Vuyst H; John-Stewart GC; Richardson BA; McGrath CJ; Marson KG; Trinh TT; Yatich N; Kiptinness C; Cagle A; Nyongesa-Malava E; Sakr SR; Mugo NR; Chung MH JAMA; 2019 Oct; 322(16):1570-1579. PubMed ID: 31638680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: the predictive value of conization margin status. Young JL; Jazaeri AA; Lachance JA; Stoler MH; Irvin WP; Rice LW; Andersen WA; Modesitt SC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 197(2):195.e1-7; discussion 195.e7-8. PubMed ID: 17689647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 diagnosed by punch biopsy in 131 women. Ding Z; Jiang C; Shore T; Pather S; Dalrymple C; Atkinson K; Murali R; Al-Rayyan ES; Luo K; Carter J J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jul; 37(7):754-61. PubMed ID: 21395898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The effect of coexisting squamous cell lesions on prognosis in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Song T; Lee YY; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jul; 190():26-30. PubMed ID: 25956340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after conization: a 10-year study. Serati M; Siesto G; Carollo S; Formenti G; Riva C; Cromi A; Ghezzi F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 22771223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]