354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28182285)
1. An audit of the results of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of mammography versus ultrasound screen-detected breast lesions.
Rhee SJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):261-266. PubMed ID: 28182285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.
Bae S; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 26357494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new risk stratification score for the management of ultrasound-detected B3 breast lesions.
Giuliani M; Rinaldi P; Rella R; D'Angelo A; Carlino G; Infante A; Romani M; Bufi E; Belli P; Manfredi R
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):965-970. PubMed ID: 30216597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Annual Trends in Ultrasonography-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Lesions.
Jung I; Han K; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 21(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 32090518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benign papilloma without atypia diagnosed at US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: clinical and US features predictive of upgrade to malignancy.
Youk JH; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Park BW; Kim SI
Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 20971773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsy.
Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Yu CP; Chang WC; Tung HJ; Lin WC; Tsai SH; Huang GS
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):447-54. PubMed ID: 22161618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Chung SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Han W; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25458226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. US-guided 14G core needle biopsy: comparison between underestimated and correctly diagnosed breast cancers.
Kim H; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Jung WH; Son EJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(7):3179-83. PubMed ID: 24815467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Asymptomatic Benign Papilloma Without Atypia Diagnosed at Ultrasonography-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy: Which Subgroup can be Managed by Observation?
Kim SY; Kim EK; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Koo JS; Moon HJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):1860-6. PubMed ID: 26920388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of sonographically guided core needle biopsy and excision in breast papillomas: clinical and sonographic features predictive of malignancy.
Sohn YM; Park SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Feb; 32(2):303-11. PubMed ID: 23341387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographically Occult Asymptomatic Radial Scars/Complex Sclerosing Lesions at Ultrasonography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy: Follow-Up Can Be Recommended.
Park VY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Moon HJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 42(10):2367-71. PubMed ID: 27444865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of BI-RADS Ultrasound Subcategories 4A to 4C in Predicting Breast Cancer.
Spinelli Varella MA; Teixeira da Cruz J; Rauber A; Varella IS; Fleck JF; Moreira LF
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e507-e511. PubMed ID: 29066139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging findings and accuracy of core needle biopsy in mucinous carcinoma of the breast.
Bode MK; Rissanen T
Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 21498339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict malignant upgrading of atypical ductal hyperplasia.
Li JK; Jin ZY; Xu YJ; Fu NQ; Jiang Y; Li SY; Niu RL; Liu G; Wang ZL
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Feb; 26(1):27. PubMed ID: 38347651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of ultrasound, cytological, and histological features of 110 benign BI-RADS categories 4C and 5 nonpalpable breast lesions. The Institut Curie's experience.
Farras Roca JA; Tardivon A; Thibault F; Rouzier R; Klijanienko J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Jun; 129(6):479-488. PubMed ID: 33689204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
