195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28182294)
1. Is There a Right to the Death of the Foetus?
Mathison E; Davis J
Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):313-320. PubMed ID: 28182294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 30341923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus.
Räsänen J
Bioethics; 2017 Nov; 31(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 29044695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Doubts about a classic defence of abortion.
Difford J
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2011; 17(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 23350221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ectogenesis and a right to the death of the prenatal human being: A reply to Räsänen.
Kaczor C
Bioethics; 2018 Nov; 32(9):634-638. PubMed ID: 30252944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis.
Blackshaw B; Rodger D
Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 33811355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two stalemates in the philosophical debate about abortion and why they cannot be resolved using analogical arguments.
Kaposy C
Bioethics; 2012 Feb; 26(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 20377572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The parenthood argument.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 29171657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pregnant people, inseminators and tissues of human origin: how ectogenesis challenges the concept of abortion.
Kendal E
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2020 Dec; 38(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 33175992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. There is no right to the death of the fetus.
Hendricks P
Bioethics; 2018 Jul; 32(6):395-397. PubMed ID: 29883519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a normal foetus really have a future of value? A reply to Marquis.
Lovering RP
Bioethics; 2005 Apr; 19(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 15943022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of philosophy in the contemporary abortion debate.
Kortiansky P
Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 15675038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion Rights after Artificial Wombs: Why Decriminalisation is Needed Ahead of Ectogenesis.
Horn C
Med Law Rev; 2021 Aug; 29(1):80-105. PubMed ID: 34370037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject.
Himma KE
J Med Ethics; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15634753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The right to be born.
Davey DA
Med Law; 1989; 7(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 2493554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The British Abortion Act (1967) and the interests of the foetus.
Mavroforou A; Michalodimitrakis E
Med Law; 2006 Mar; 25(1):175-88. PubMed ID: 16681121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the impairment argument.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):400-406. PubMed ID: 33527428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion: in search of a constitutional doctrine (Part 1).
Leyshon DJ
Med Law; 1991; 10(2):155-83. PubMed ID: 1886465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
