197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28182294)
21. Critical notice--defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith.
Stretton D
J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):793-7. PubMed ID: 18974412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.
Marquis D
J Med Ethics; 2001 Dec; 27(6):363-9. PubMed ID: 11731597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Christian philosopher's view of recent directions in the abortion debate.
Lee P
Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):7-31. PubMed ID: 15672530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion, Rights, and Cabin Cases.
Simkulet W
New Bioeth; 2022 Dec; 28(4):315-326. PubMed ID: 36121890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Violinists, demandingness, and the impairment argument against abortion.
Crummett D
Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 31782822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The deprivation argument against abortion.
Stretton D
Bioethics; 2004 Apr; 18(2):144-80. PubMed ID: 15148946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The case of abortion.
Pulgini LM
J Urban Law; 1974 Nov; 52(2):277-338. PubMed ID: 11664382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Abortion and the human animal.
Tollefsen C
Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 15675044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The fetus as parasite and mushroom: Judith Jarvis Thomson's defense of abortion.
Meilaender G
Linacre Q; 1979 May; 46(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 11660920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The rights of the embryo and the foetus in private law: the Italian experience.
Mazzoni CM
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2002; (17):83-97. PubMed ID: 12703110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The pro-life argument from substantial identity and the pro-choice argument from asymmetric value: a reply to Patrick Lee.
Reiman J
Bioethics; 2007 Jul; 21(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 17845457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. When does personhood begin?
Donovan P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 6680701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Elective Abandonment: A Male Counterpart to Abortion.
Playford RC
New Bioeth; 2018 Jul; 24(2):122-134. PubMed ID: 29741450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The status of frozen embryos.
Anderson SL
Public Aff Q; 1990 Oct; 4(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 11656048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Avoiding the Personhood Issue: Abortion, Identity, and Marquis's 'Future-Like-Ours' Argument.
Reitan E
Bioethics; 2016 May; 30(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 26424415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Chapter 5. Diagnosis on the embryo and the foetus: its consequences].
Nisand I
J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci; 2018 Mar; 28(4):87-91. PubMed ID: 29561090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Women, ectogenesis and ethical theory.
Cannold L
J Appl Philos; 1995; 12(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 12416524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment.
Van de Weghe B
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Ensuring a stillborn: the ethics of fetal lethal injection in late abortion.
Callahan JC
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 8605389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative judicial embryology: judges' approaches to unborn human life.
Dickens BM
Can J Fam Law; 1990; 9(1):180-92. PubMed ID: 11656080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
