These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28182477)

  • 1. It does exist! A left-to-right spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect among native Hebrew speakers.
    Zohar-Shai B; Tzelgov J; Karni A; Rubinsten O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):719-728. PubMed ID: 28182477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial-numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among Hebrew-speaking children.
    Feldman A; Oscar-Strom Y; Tzelgov J; Berger A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 May; 181():102-109. PubMed ID: 30735908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial-numerical associations.
    Pfister R; Schroeder PA; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1953-8. PubMed ID: 23647378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects.
    Cipora K; Soltanlou M; Reips UD; Nuerk HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1676-1692. PubMed ID: 30805864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang M; Gong T; Li X; Li Z; Gao X; Zhang S; Jiang T; Chen C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229130. PubMed ID: 32092079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to cook a SNARC: number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations.
    Fischer MH; Mills RA; Shaki S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 19917517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Don't SNARC me now! Intraindividual variability of cognitive phenomena - Insights from the Ironman paradigm.
    Roth L; Jordan V; Schwarz S; Willmes K; Nuerk HC; van Dijck JP; Cipora K
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 248():105781. PubMed ID: 38663115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reveals a dissociation between SNARC and MARC effects: Implication for the polarity correspondence account.
    Di Rosa E; Bardi L; Umiltà C; Masina F; Forgione M; Mapelli D
    Cortex; 2017 Aug; 93():68-78. PubMed ID: 28623718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.
    van Dijck JP; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30739136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Ito Y; Hatta T
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jun; 32(4):662-73. PubMed ID: 15478760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
    Hesse PN; Bremmer F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It takes just one word to quash a SNARC.
    Fischer MH; Shaki S; Cruise A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 19447752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNARC Effect in Different Effectors.
    Hesse PN; Fiehler K; Bremmer F
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):180-95. PubMed ID: 26562877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.
    Lopiccolo D; Chang CB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261146. PubMed ID: 34914756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of working memory load on the SNARC effect: Maybe tasks have a word to say.
    Deng Z; Chen Y; Zhu X; Li Y
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):428-441. PubMed ID: 27909981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Key Distance to Clarify a Theory on the SNARC.
    Schiller F; Eloka O; Franz VH
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):196-221. PubMed ID: 26822868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.