192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28182623)
1. Evaluation of DNA barcodes in Codonopsis (Campanulaceae) and in some large angiosperm plant genera.
Wang DY; Wang Q; Wang YL; Xiang XG; Huang LQ; Jin XH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170286. PubMed ID: 28182623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the DNA barcodes in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) from mainland Asia.
Xu S; Li D; Li J; Xiang X; Jin W; Huang W; Jin X; Huang L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0115168. PubMed ID: 25602282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Barcoding success as a function of phylogenetic relatedness in Viburnum, a clade of woody angiosperms.
Clement WL; Donoghue MJ
BMC Evol Biol; 2012 May; 12():73. PubMed ID: 22646220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of species in the angiosperm family Apiaceae using DNA barcodes.
Liu J; Shi L; Han J; Li G; Lu H; Hou J; Zhou X; Meng F; Downie SR
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Nov; 14(6):1231-8. PubMed ID: 24739357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA barcoding the Canadian Arctic flora: core plastid barcodes (rbcL + matK) for 490 vascular plant species.
Saarela JM; Sokoloff PC; Gillespie LJ; Consaul LL; Bull RD
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77982. PubMed ID: 24348895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing DNA barcoding in closely related groups of Lysimachia L. (Myrsinaceae).
Zhang CY; Wang FY; Yan HF; Hao G; Hu CM; Ge XJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Jan; 12(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 21967641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two New Potential Barcodes to Discriminate Dalbergia Species.
Bhagwat RM; Dholakia BB; Kadoo NY; Balasundaran M; Gupta VS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142965. PubMed ID: 26569490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of six candidate DNA barcoding loci in Ficus (Moraceae) of China.
Li HQ; Chen JY; Wang S; Xiong SZ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Sep; 12(5):783-90. PubMed ID: 22537273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA barcoding of Rhododendron (Ericaceae), the largest Chinese plant genus in biodiversity hotspots of the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains.
Yan LJ; Liu J; Möller M; Zhang L; Zhang XM; Li DZ; Gao LM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):932-44. PubMed ID: 25469426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolutionary histories determine DNA barcoding success in vascular plants: seven case studies using intraspecific broad sampling of closely related species.
Caetano Wyler S; Naciri Y
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 May; 16():103. PubMed ID: 27178437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species discrimination in Schima (Theaceae): Next-generation super-barcodes meet evolutionary complexity.
Yu XQ; Jiang YZ; Folk RA; Zhao JL; Fu CN; Fang L; Peng H; Yang JB; Yang SX
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Nov; 22(8):3161-3175. PubMed ID: 35789203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras.
Costion C; Ford A; Cross H; Crayn D; Harrington M; Lowe A
PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e26841. PubMed ID: 22096501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA barcodes for the identification of Stephania (Menispermaceae) species.
Wang X; Xue J; Zhang Y; Xie H; Wang Y; Weng W; Kang Y; Huang J
Mol Biol Rep; 2020 Mar; 47(3):2197-2203. PubMed ID: 32078092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species.
Singh HK; Parveen I; Raghuvanshi S; Babbar SB
BMC Res Notes; 2012 Jan; 5():42. PubMed ID: 22260646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Universal plant DNA barcode loci may not work in complex groups: a case study with Indian berberis species.
Roy S; Tyagi A; Shukla V; Kumar A; Singh UM; Chaudhary LB; Datt B; Bag SK; Singh PK; Nair NK; Husain T; Tuli R
PLoS One; 2010 Oct; 5(10):e13674. PubMed ID: 21060687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plant DNA barcode library for native flowering plants in the arid region of northwestern China.
Song F; Li T; Yan HF; Feng Y; Jin L; Burgess KS; Ge XJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Aug; 23(6):1389-1402. PubMed ID: 37021680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants.
; Li DZ; Gao LM; Li HT; Wang H; Ge XJ; Liu JQ; Chen ZD; Zhou SL; Chen SL; Yang JB; Fu CX; Zeng CX; Yan HF; Zhu YJ; Sun YS; Chen SY; Zhao L; Wang K; Yang T; Duan GW
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Dec; 108(49):19641-6. PubMed ID: 22100737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ycf1, the most promising plastid DNA barcode of land plants.
Dong W; Xu C; Li C; Sun J; Zuo Y; Shi S; Cheng T; Guo J; Zhou S
Sci Rep; 2015 Feb; 5():8348. PubMed ID: 25672218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER (ITS), AN IDEAL DNA BARCODE FOR SPECIES DISCRIMINATION IN CRAWFURDIA WALL. (GENTIANACEAE).
Zhang D; Jiang B; Duan L; Zhou N
Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med; 2016; 13(6):101-106. PubMed ID: 28480366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the potential of candidate DNA barcodes for identifying non-flowering seed plants.
Pang X; Luo H; Sun C
Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2012 Sep; 14(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 22309105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
