These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Spams in doctors' mailbox: their threat to health education, to patient information and to scientific research]. Felkai P; Lengyel I Orv Hetil; 2019 Oct; 160(43):1706-1710. PubMed ID: 31630551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficient information theoretic strategies for classifier combination, feature extraction and performance evaluation in improving false positives and false negatives for spam e-mail filtering. Zorkadis V; Karras DA; Panayotou M Neural Netw; 2005; 18(5-6):799-807. PubMed ID: 16111865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning for email spam filtering: review, approaches and open research problems. Dada EG; Bassi JS; Chiroma H; Abdulhamid SM; Adetunmbi AO; Ajibuwa OE Heliyon; 2019 Jun; 5(6):e01802. PubMed ID: 31211254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evading obscure communication from spam emails. Rafat KF; Xin Q; Javed AR; Jalil Z; Ahmad RZ Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Jan; 19(2):1926-1943. PubMed ID: 35135236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spam, filters, and children using the Internet. McCartney PR MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2003; 28(6):398. PubMed ID: 14597831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. SPAM: coming soon to an E-mail box near you. Co MC Comput Inform Nurs; 2003; 21(3):159, 169-70. PubMed ID: 12792198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Gateway solutions for SPAM. Johnson E Comput Inform Nurs; 2003; 21(3):161, 168. PubMed ID: 12792201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Case in point: a trial of two anti-SPAM software products. Smith D Comput Inform Nurs; 2003; 21(3):160, 165. PubMed ID: 12792199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of e-Mail Spam Detection Using a Novel Machine Learning-Based Hybrid Bagging Technique. Rayan A Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():2500772. PubMed ID: 35983156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Email spam: a single user's perspective. Grech V; Hugo AM J Vis Commun Med; 2008; 31(3):110-2. PubMed ID: 19085612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive Online Sequential ELM for Concept Drift Tackling. Budiman A; Fanany MI; Basaruddin C Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():8091267. PubMed ID: 27594879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenges of internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results. Koo M; Skinner H J Med Internet Res; 2005 Mar; 7(1):e6. PubMed ID: 15829478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical Analysis of Weapons of Influence, Life Domains, and Demographic-Targeting in Modern Spam - An Age-Comparative Perspective. Oliveira DS; Lin T; Rocha H; Ellis D; Dommaraju S; Yang H; Weir D; Marin S; Ebner NC Crime Sci; 2019; 8():. PubMed ID: 31231604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enter your e-mail address: how German Internet users manage their e-mail addresses. Utz S Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Apr; 7(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15140366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]