These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28183074)
1. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies. Liu B; Gao S; Li S Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis. Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases. Stecco A; Buemi F; Cassarà A; Matheoud R; Sacchetti GM; Arnulfo A; Brambilla M; Carriero A Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):537-45. PubMed ID: 27033474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer. Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings. Lv K; Guo HM; Lu YJ; Wu ZX; Zhang K; Han JK Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1204-11. PubMed ID: 25222911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PET-CT versus MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. He T; Sun J; Wu J; Wang H; Liang C; Wang H; Li S; Su S Microsc Res Tech; 2022 May; 85(5):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 34981608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and endometrial cancer: clinical and pathological factors influencing it. Nogami Y; Banno K; Irie H; Iida M; Kisu I; Masugi Y; Tanaka K; Tominaga E; Okuda S; Murakami K; Aoki D Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25368102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer. Luo Q; Luo L; Tang L Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533034617742311. PubMed ID: 29343205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Huang SM; Yin L; Yue JL; Li YF; Yang Y; Lin ZC Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(50):e13344. PubMed ID: 30557983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [ Adam JA; van Diepen PR; Mom CH; Stoker J; van Eck-Smit BLF; Bipat S Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):588-596. PubMed ID: 32921477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer. Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy. Ergul N; Kadioglu H; Yildiz S; Yucel SB; Gucin Z; Erdogan EB; Aydin M; Muslumanoglu M Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 25013091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gong Y; Guo Z; Tang X; Li C; Wang Q Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 31505492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detecting primary colorectal cancer and regional lymph node metastases. Ono K; Ochiai R; Yoshida T; Kitagawa M; Omagari J; Kobayashi H; Yamashita Y J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 19161185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer? Schaefferkoetter JD; Carlson ER; Heidel RE J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25869746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative lymph-node staging of invasive urothelial bladder cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histopathology. Jensen TK; Holt P; Gerke O; Riehmann M; Svolgaard B; Marcussen N; Bouchelouche K Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 21231796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]