790 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28183074)
1. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
Liu B; Gao S; Li S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.
Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y
Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases.
Stecco A; Buemi F; Cassarà A; Matheoud R; Sacchetti GM; Arnulfo A; Brambilla M; Carriero A
Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):537-45. PubMed ID: 27033474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings.
Lv K; Guo HM; Lu YJ; Wu ZX; Zhang K; Han JK
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1204-11. PubMed ID: 25222911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PET-CT versus MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
He T; Sun J; Wu J; Wang H; Liang C; Wang H; Li S; Su S
Microsc Res Tech; 2022 May; 85(5):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 34981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and endometrial cancer: clinical and pathological factors influencing it.
Nogami Y; Banno K; Irie H; Iida M; Kisu I; Masugi Y; Tanaka K; Tominaga E; Okuda S; Murakami K; Aoki D
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25368102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Luo Q; Luo L; Tang L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533034617742311. PubMed ID: 29343205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer.
Huang SM; Yin L; Yue JL; Li YF; Yang Y; Lin ZC
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(50):e13344. PubMed ID: 30557983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [
Adam JA; van Diepen PR; Mom CH; Stoker J; van Eck-Smit BLF; Bipat S
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):588-596. PubMed ID: 32921477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy.
Ergul N; Kadioglu H; Yildiz S; Yucel SB; Gucin Z; Erdogan EB; Aydin M; Muslumanoglu M
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 25013091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gong Y; Guo Z; Tang X; Li C; Wang Q
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 31505492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detecting primary colorectal cancer and regional lymph node metastases.
Ono K; Ochiai R; Yoshida T; Kitagawa M; Omagari J; Kobayashi H; Yamashita Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 19161185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer?
Schaefferkoetter JD; Carlson ER; Heidel RE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25869746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative lymph-node staging of invasive urothelial bladder cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histopathology.
Jensen TK; Holt P; Gerke O; Riehmann M; Svolgaard B; Marcussen N; Bouchelouche K
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 21231796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer.
Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
