These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28184115)

  • 1. Standard Reference Specimens in Quality Control of Engineering Surfaces.
    Song JF; Vorburger TV
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 1991; 96(3):271-289. PubMed ID: 28184115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Wavelet Packet Transform for Surface Roughness Evaluation and Texture Extraction.
    Wang X; Shi T; Liao G; Zhang Y; Hong Y; Chen K
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28441749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction in Errors in Roughness Evaluation with an Accurate Definition of the S-L Surface.
    Podulka P; Macek W; Branco R; Nejad RM
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 36902980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedure for Calibrating the Z-axis of a Confocal Microscope: Application for the Evaluation of Structured Surfaces.
    Wang C; Caja J; Gómez E; Maresca P
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30691214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the Effect of the Surface Inclination Angle on the Roughness of Polymeric Parts Obtained with Fused Filament Fabrication Technology.
    Martín Fernández F; Martín Sánchez MJ
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 36771886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of a Surface Roughness Comparison between Stylus Instruments and Confocal Microscopes.
    Mínguez-Martínez A; Maresca P; Caja J; Oliva JVY
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Aug; 15(16):. PubMed ID: 36013632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental investigation and development of a deep learning framework to predict process-induced surface roughness in additively manufactured aluminum alloys.
    Muhammad W; Kang J; Ibragimova O; Inal K
    Weld World; 2023; 67(4):897-921. PubMed ID: 37070123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface roughness and dimension accuracy data from hybrid manufacturing process using PLA material.
    Susanto B; Rashyid MI; Tanbar F; Ariyadi HM; Muflikhun MA
    Data Brief; 2024 Jun; 54():110477. PubMed ID: 38756928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Novel Camera-Based Measurement System for Roughness Determination of Concrete Surfaces.
    Özcan B; Schwermann R; Blankenbach J
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 33396398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture.
    Whitehead SA; Shearer AC; Watts DC; Wilson NH
    Dent Mater; 1999 Mar; 15(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 10551099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing Surface Roughness Variations in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Nylon Carbon Fiber Composites.
    Abas M; Awadh MA; Habib T; Noor S
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Sep; 15(17):. PubMed ID: 37688259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types.
    Kohles SS; Clark MB; Brown CA; Kenealy JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 15346747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterizing three-dimensional topography of engineering and biomaterial surfaces by confocal laser scanning and stylus techniques.
    Wennerberg A; Ohlsson R; Rosén BG; Andersson B
    Med Eng Phys; 1996 Oct; 18(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 8892239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.
    Kuhar M; Funduk N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface Roughness Characterisation and Analysis of the Electron Beam Melting (EBM) Process.
    Galati M; Minetola P; Rizza G
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Jul; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 31323959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality Assessment of a Novel Camera-Based Measurement System for Roughness Determination of Concrete Surfaces-Accuracy Evaluation and Validation.
    Özcan B; Blankenbach J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Backscattering Characteristics of Machining Surfaces and Retrieval of Surface Multi-Parameters].
    Tao HR; Zhang FM; Qu XH
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1986-91. PubMed ID: 26717764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters.
    Song JF; Rudder FF; Vorburger TV; Smith JH
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 1995; 100(5):543-561. PubMed ID: 29151760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.